RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,160
Posts: 5,402,383
Members: 24,750
Currently online: 570
Newest member: yadmank

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Art

Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 7 2010, 01:04 AM   #1
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
"Challenger"

Every time I near the end of one of these projects I think of that cliche aphorism about art being "abandoned, but never finished."
Well, after adding a couple more textures and tweaking the lights some more, sometime in the next 24 hours I hope to abandon this guy.
Until then I guess it remains a work in progress.













Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 03:24 AM   #2
David cgc
Vice Admiral
 
David cgc's Avatar
 
Re: "Challenger"

Pretty cool. Do you have, like, a backstory for it or something? In your head, is it the expression of some JJVerse design concepts as they came out in the Prime Verse, or the other way around, or was it just a cool 50/50 meld conceptually?
__________________
“I come here to have fun and fuck around merrily. I expect to showered by all kind of random crap.”
iguana_tonante
David cgc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 03:32 AM   #3
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Challenger"

No, I never really come up with much backstory for these things - just combine the design elements that I like (I'm obviously not adding much original other than details).

I've seen a couple of old meshes I did years ago listed at various sites as "pre-TOS" through "TNG era" - the same meshes.

I think I'll dub this one an "Abrams class starcruiser," though.


The engine nacelles on Church's design are my favorite part of it - they pretty much update the TOS nacelles while bypassing the following forty years. The nacelles on the TMP ship are the only part of it I've never liked much. So...
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 03:57 AM   #4
YARN
Fleet Captain
 
Re: "Challenger"

Looks great.

You made the Abram's style nacelles fit in well with the TMP design.

It almost seems like you are playing it too safe here. It looks like the TMP ship kit-bashed with the new nacelles. It would be nice to see some hints of the TOS ship thrown in with a few more allusions to the new design.

It is an appealing and balanced look though. Very nice.
YARN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 03:48 PM   #5
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: "Challenger"

These are gorgeous. Great lighting and rendering quality.

I wouldn't mind seeing the Enterprise's nacelles slimmed down a bit in the next movie as you have done here. They look mush better proportioned this way.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 04:35 PM   #6
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Challenger"

Thanks.

I had those nacelles every different size while I was working on this. As they are, they're a little greater in diameter through the domes than the TOS ship, and a little less long than TOS nacelles. The contours of these things give a different impression where size is concerned than most Trek ships, IMAO.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2010, 07:26 PM   #7
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Challenger"

David cgc, incoming PM.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 01:35 AM   #8
DestinyCaptain
Commander
 
DestinyCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: U.S.S. Destiny NCC-720 Leif Ericson II Class Explorer
Re: "Challenger"

I like yours better...
DestinyCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 02:09 AM   #9
David cgc
Vice Admiral
 
David cgc's Avatar
 
Re: "Challenger"

Dennis wrote: View Post
David cgc, incoming PM.
I tried to reply, but the system yelled at me. Suffice it to say, thanks, and watch this space.
__________________
“I come here to have fun and fuck around merrily. I expect to showered by all kind of random crap.”
iguana_tonante
David cgc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 02:11 AM   #10
Kelso
Vice Admiral
 
Kelso's Avatar
 
Location: On the destruct button until the last minute!
View Kelso's Twitter Profile
Re: "Challenger"

Looks great.

Without a profile shot, it's hard to tell how far the deflector sticks out from the neck. That's one aspect of the new Enterprise that I really just don't like. Looks like you might've bridged the gap with the torpedo launcher... but, like I said, hard to tell without a profile shot.

Also, could you please post a profile shot?
Kelso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 02:57 AM   #11
Kaiser
Rear Admiral
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Location: Boyertown, PA as of July 2011
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Kaiser Send a message via Yahoo to Kaiser
Re: "Challenger"

freakin awesome design there
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/groups/112860258811333/ For all your Sci-fi ship model and mini goodness 3DS Friend code: 0731-4800-6817
Kaiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 03:18 AM   #12
DFScott
Captain
 
DFScott's Avatar
 
Location: Indianapolis, IN
View DFScott's Twitter Profile
Re: "Challenger"

Reiterating something I've said here before several years ago, but which others may not have seen: Dennis, I think maybe you understand the proper proportions of the Constitution class cruiser better than any modeler out there, including those who have worked at Paramount/CBS. You can do any number of variations on this theme, from subtle to bold, and yet they all still manage to maintain this "golden mean" that Matt Jefferies set forth. My personal favorite has been the Venture NCC-1946/Challenger NCC-2099, which looks (probably intentionally) like a Constitution class refit refit, to keep going into the era of the Ambassador class. Although your slightly retro Phoenix NCC-800 is also strong.

So looking at this version of Challenger NX-1799, my first thought is. . . ah, that's better. I cannot get over the whap-jaw appearance of the STXI Enterprise, like it has baggy eyes and an overbite. This rendition, at least, applies some of Abrams' "hot-rod" ideas to a model at the correct proportions.

But you know. . . Even with the 1799's pylons seated at the proper angle, with round, red Bussard collectors, they're still not my favorite. Compared to the 2099's red bullet-nose pylons with the Sovereign-like struts, I still can't get a feel for Ryan Church's design choices of baggy, Bill Clinton-like eyes, and the half-shell with the cyan lights peeking through. With every other "official" design, I could always ascertain some purpose for the visible design elements; these things still look like poorly planned disco lights to me.

What I think your new model proves is that the Enterprise didn't need these particular design additions; and that the jutting forward of the nose, extension of the dish, and flapping up of the wings didn't justify their existence. Even something whose differences are more aesthetically subtle, like your Intrepid NCC-1986, would have been more pleasing for me to look at on-screen. Making the Enterprise wear these bags on the big screen is like casting Sophia Loren in the starring role but making her wear a chicken costume. Sure, it's still Sophia, but why ruin such graceful lines with poor adornment?

DFS-2010/A
__________________
a.k.a. Scott M. Fulton, III
Editor, FierceEnterpriseCommunications (sorry, not really a Trek magazine)
DFScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 03:19 AM   #13
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Challenger"

Kelso wrote: View Post
Looks great.

Without a profile shot, it's hard to tell how far the deflector sticks out from the neck. That's one aspect of the new Enterprise that I really just don't like. Looks like you might've bridged the gap with the torpedo launcher... but, like I said, hard to tell without a profile shot.

Also, could you please post a profile shot?
Just for the hell of it, I thought I'd post a profile shot.

Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 03:22 AM   #14
Kaiser
Rear Admiral
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Location: Boyertown, PA as of July 2011
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Kaiser Send a message via Yahoo to Kaiser
Re: "Challenger"

very majestic buety shot there
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/groups/112860258811333/ For all your Sci-fi ship model and mini goodness 3DS Friend code: 0731-4800-6817
Kaiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2010, 03:43 AM   #15
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Challenger"

DFScott, thanks for the kind words. I'm a big fan of the JJPrise, myself - what I do with this kind of thing is hardly design, just close variations on other people's work.

And you're mentioning models that I don't even remember. I need to go over to Foundation3d and do a search on my own stuff.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.