|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#466 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
Maybe I'm slow, but I just figured out the meaning of your avatar and I love it! (Did you happen to read the article on Palin found in the New York magazine? Awesome and insightful!) Dennis, to get it on topic again, let me say again, you wrote a damn good Star Trek episode, the Tressaurian Intersection. It is so good, so captivating and so wide open ... I still can't figure out how it will end. Heck, I can't even figure out how that shuttlecraft is going to distract a dozen ships! Kudos to you for drafting such an incredibly compelling Trek story. And when I see the ending, I'll tell you what I really think
__________________
Logic is the beginning of wisdom... not the end. |
|
|
|
|
#467 |
|
The Man
Location: Defying Gravity
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
We promote Vandi Richards to Captain of Starfleet's flagship on the basis of a week's service about Exeter. Seemed to make sense at the time.
__________________
I had steak and a loaded baked potato for dinner on Sunday. As a steak I enjoyed it a lot, but as macaroni and cheese I thought it was disappointing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#468 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
Star Trek Reviewed links to hundreds of Star Trek Fan Films and Reviews |
|
|
|
|
#469 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
|
|
|
|
|
#470 |
|
Commodore
Location: Twin Cities
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
Even with people making calls to release the segments before they are ready during all this time, I don't think I recall anyone asking (directly) what happens at the end. I think that is quite cool! I know most people will disagree with this (not having seen the full film) but I remarked to Dennis a few years back that the delayed release schedule has actually increased the impact of the story. Of course that was just before the release of the third segment and I had no idea that the final segment was going to take this long to finish... but I'm still glad that the original schedule was flushed out an airlock!
|
|
|
|
|
#471 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Between Rigel VII and Talos IV
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
We're not going to go? To be certain? - Spock, The Cage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
Star Trek Reviewed links to hundreds of Star Trek Fan Films and Reviews |
|
|
|
|
#473 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
I feel more confident about Vandi becoming Captain of Starfleet's flagship after one week's service than I do about Sarah Palin becoming President after being Governor for almost half a term!
__________________
Logic is the beginning of wisdom... not the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
#474 | ||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
||
|
|
|
|
#475 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Twin Cities
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
When I saw the episode all the way through, that scene was one that I told both Jimm and Dennis that it had a chilling effect on the remainder of the episode. Richards was to seem annoying to Garrovick because she was under foot... but the character as filmed/acted was running dangerously close (actually, crossed the line) to being annoying to the audience. The role of the editor is to protect the story and the characters, even if it is protecting them from themselves. I think the editing out of many of Richards more annoying aspects makes her a more endearing character in the episode. And the same thing could be said about how both Harris and Cutty were dealt with in editing as well. I may not know anything about the movie/television business, but from what I gather writers over write stories on the page, directors attempt to get as much footage as possible in the can, and editors attempt to carve out the final work from all that excess. The hardest rule to follow in creative endeavors like this is: less is more. Exeter may not be the fastest fan film to be released, but I sure can't fault most of the editing choices made so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#476 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." Last edited by Maurice Navidad; May 9 2010 at 01:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#477 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
__________________
Star Trek Reviewed links to hundreds of Star Trek Fan Films and Reviews |
|
|
|
|
#478 |
|
Commodore
Location: Twin Cities
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
|
|
|
|
|
#479 |
|
Commodore
Location: Staten Island, NY
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
Last edited by xortex; May 9 2010 at 02:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#480 |
|
Commodore
Location: Staten Island, NY
|
Re: Whatever happened to Starship Exeter?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















