|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#211 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
Genocide - systematic killing of a racial or cultural group. The Borg are an amalgam of various species they've assimilated over the years. And with a single hive mind I see little in the way of a good argument that they have a unique culture and that the universe would be losing something if they were eradicated. The Borg at this point are nothing more than a wondering computer program executing a set on instructions given to it untold years. Picard should have pulled the plug.
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#212 | ||||||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The EIB Network
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
![]() So, you assume I haven't read your thread...just because I didn't reply the way you wanted to?
Again, billions upon billions of lives were at stake in the Dominion war, too.
__________________
"I have been wounded but not yet slain. I shall lie here and bleed awhile. Then I shall rise and fight again." "Forget it, Jake...it's Chinatown." |
||||||
|
|
|
|
#213 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
One recent example - in the DS9 thread, you didn't read the threads I mentioned and, 2 posts later, you were complaining I didn't provided them. As for the Founder genocide - I already refuted your argument, Rush Limborg - multiple times. But you just kept repeating your tune, oblivious - you remind me of Anwar: The founders had little involment in the administration of the Dominion/the leadership of Jem'hadar. The Vorta did thiese things most of the time. Killing all the founders would only have made the Vorta/Jem'hadar, angrier, more determined. They would have never stopped coming for the Federation - NEVER. If it takes hundreds of years, they would still come. As for defeating the Alpha Quadrant Jem'hadar expeditionary force - replenishing ships and jem'hadar takes time and resources - and it can only be done in the gamma quadrant. The founders could not have sent anything to the Federation for decades. At least some positive result - unlike killing the founders. |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#215 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The EIB Network
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
To be perfectly frank, ProtoAvatar...you accuse me of repeating my questions--but I assure you, it is not because I did not read you answers. It is because you repeat your statements--albeit in embellished forms. I simply repeated it because you acted as if your statements explained themselves--which they did not. Also, as "Starship Down" made perfectly clear--the Founders dying, in fact, result in the Jem'Hadar commiting suicide, for failing to save them. (I seem to recall you, or was it someone else, claiming that that was "just one incident"? Well...?) Furthermore, you said the Vorta ran things most of the time. Recall that the F.C. took part in the formation of the alliance with the Breen--and that Weyoun constantly rebuked Damar with words along the lines of "You would disobey/question the Founder?" Though Weyoun seemed to run things at first, the F.C. seemed to hold more authority as time went on. Now...again, I do read your posts, all too well. You say:
Second--again, the situation is the same. Recall that in the finale, the Dominion fleet was going to be destroyed anyway. Thus, the only Jem'Hadar/Vorta threat, if your theory holds, would be from the Gamma Quadrant. So...what makes the two scenarios different? Simple. The Founders--who had been, again, the designers of the Jem'Hadar and the enhanced Vorta--are wiped out in one scenario. In the other, they are not. Either way, the Domion is enraged, and out for revenge. However...in one scenario, the head of the serpent is cut off.
__________________
"I have been wounded but not yet slain. I shall lie here and bleed awhile. Then I shall rise and fight again." "Forget it, Jake...it's Chinatown." |
||
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
Yet again, you prove that responding to you is a waste of timme - the arguments you presented here were also refuted by me in that ~"genocide" thread: Killing the founders will still let you with a large and angry Jem'hadar army in the Alpha Quadrant. Managing to defeat the Alpha Quadrant Dominion will leave the main Dominion unable to strike for decades. This is NOT a perfect solution? Well, don't expect perfect solutions from genocide. The Vorta/Jem'hadar killing themselves insted of taking revenge in an unending Jihad is EXTREMELY UNLIKELY. Creating LARGE NUMBERS of Jem'hadar/building ships takes resources and time - they don't appear out of thin air. Edit - about Hartzilla2007's argument: http://trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=4046590&postcount=330 |
|
|
|
|
#217 | |
|
Captain
Location: The Land of Moose and Squirrel
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
Was Picard right or wrong in his decision? I think when they weighed all the options, allowing an individual mind to link to the collective sounded like a more "Human" solution, rather then committing mass genocide. Sure it was a survival of the fittest where it's kinda a "Kill or be killed/assimilation" situation..... and don't forget that Picard was gunning for wiping them all out until he actually stopped looking at them as mindless automatons and actually talked to one to see that indeed, a person does still exist deep down inside.... they're victims.... prisoners if you will. In the end, it seemed as though there was just as much of a chance for individuality to break apart the collective and remove the borg threat, then this virus idea which wouldn't have given anyone a chance at survival and individuality and thus wipe out billions of lives. Simpler? Perhaps Easier? Perhaps Would it have been right to commit genocide when alternative options were available? If you were in the same position and had no knowledge of the out come where Lore would have taken over and almost created an even worse form of Borg.... it'd be difficult for any of us to come to the exact same conclusions. In the end, I believe Picard made the right decision, though I could understand if the alternative was chosen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#218 | |||||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The EIB Network
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
__________________
"I have been wounded but not yet slain. I shall lie here and bleed awhile. Then I shall rise and fight again." "Forget it, Jake...it's Chinatown." |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#219 | |||
|
Captain
Location: The Land of Moose and Squirrel
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
The Vorta stayed alive and it was only the Jem'Hadar who were on the planet responsible for the rescue effort who killed themselves, because they were responsible for the Founder's safety..... note that the female Vorta transported back to the Jem'Hadar ship orbiting the planet after the conflict, which would mean someone had to still be alive on the ship to beam her back and to fly it. In other episodes, it is noted that the Vorta are the ones who deal with the Cloning and White development, meanwhile it was the founders who made the Vorta smart in the first place..... so technically speaking, the Jem'Hadar and Vorta could have continued on if the Founders died..... but that's a "Could" meaning, I wouldn't be 100% sure on that. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#220 | ||||||||||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
They never said that the Borg were all destroyed, just that one Unimatrix getting blown up.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#221 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
Picard had a chance to stop the borg and he didn't use it, knowing that the borg are and will continue to kill BILLIONS, in an orgy of violence, death and suffering beyond comprehension... Picard either used the weapon against the borg (using Hugh), destroying the hive mind, or he didn't, in which case he, too, is responsible for the death of BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS at the hands of the borg. One can only choose the 'lesser evil' in this situation; there's no moral, 'white' choice. Picard allowed the borg to endure, staining his hands with the blood of BILLIONS. Picard choose 'the GREATER evil', by far. And why did Picard do this? He did it in order to delude himself that, even in this situation, he made the perfectly moral, 'white' choice. So he took the choice that had the APPARENCE of being 'white', moral. As for the BILLIONS the borg continued to kill, well, if Picard didn't have to see their faces as they died, he can keep telling himself they're not his problem, that their blood is not staining his hands, too." About 'alternatives' - in the episode it was pretty clearly established that the paradox was the only weapon with realistic chances of working: "Consider the crew's attitude towards this 'individuality' weapon - a jaded it 'may' do something. Compare it with their certainty that the paradox will work. The individuality attack was a long shot, had very low chances of succes. Enterprises' crew knew that - and they were proven right by the individuality attack's failure to even scrarch the collective - only 1 ship affected out of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CUBES the collective has? It didn't even slow down the borg!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
It does not matter if the virus would or would not have worked, what matters is that Picard believed the virus would work. As Picard himself admitted, the moral thing to do is not always the right thing to do. |
|
|
|
|
#223 | |||||||||
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
HOW IS A PLANET OF 100,000 PEOPLE MORE OF A THREAT TO THE BORG THAN A FEDERATION OF BILLIONS?!! Also, I don't recall saying Picard directly killed billions. Indirectly, he might have. Why didn't the Borg send more than one cube in Star Trek: First Contact? If the Federation destroyed one cube, it would make sense to send two cubes the next time. After all, the Borg have plenty to spare. Anwar, you are just repeating yourself because you know you are in the wrong. You can't back up what you claim. You say the Borg can be antagonized into launching a "real invasion" but you have no proof. I am beginning to suspect you are a troll. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
#224 | |||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#225 | ||||||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The EIB Network
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
![]()
I think, though, Picard should have discussed it with Hugh--and, if Greater Than The Sum is any indication, Hugh would have agreed. But anyhow, recall also that Picard side-stepped his "high-horse" moralism by asserting that Hugh's individuality would spread like the virus would have, once he was re-connected. Of course, Picard learned the error of his ways for real in "Descent". Ah, well....
__________________
"I have been wounded but not yet slain. I shall lie here and bleed awhile. Then I shall rise and fight again." "Forget it, Jake...it's Chinatown." |
||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| borg |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















