|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#136 | |||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: NJ, USA
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
This is all supposition and not fact...the Borg changed and evolved in I, Borg...the Borg changed and evolved in STFC, the Borg literally evolved in Voyager "Drone"...http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Drone_%28episode%29. This isn't Star Wars...we dont have to see races as all "evil" or all "good". How do you know that Starfleet won't invent something that can consistently shut of Borg subspace signals on a mass scale, then remove/kill nanoprobes? You are condeming an awful lot of species to death. Also...http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Unimatrix_Zero?????? RAMA
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey |
|||
|
|
|
|
#137 | ||
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
About the borg 'changing': Picard's words said it best, in 'Scorpion' - "You should not expect reason or compassion from the borg. In its collective stare, it knows no reason, no remorse; only the will to conquer." The borg is a special case - a sentient mind, without free will; the hive mind follows static, unchanging impuses/drives. That's why the borg is situated the boundary between sentience and non-sentiece. And make no mistake, there is nothing unstable about its state, nothing amenable to change, to 'evolution' as you call it - its motivation didn't change since its appearance - 'the will to conquer'. When dealing with the romulans, Dominion, etc, there is always the chance they will choose to have peace. NOT so with the borg - peace is trully not in its nature, just as it isn't in the nature of a calculator to paint. You praying for the borg to change is a waste of time - you might just as well pray for the souls of your ancestors to come back from the dead as you remember them and start talking about what's new. About the Federation inventing some magic gizmo to turn the borg into angels: Your argument has become that Picard was right not to use the paradox in 'I, Borg' because the Federation will invent a magic solution that can do whatever you want. Your magic solution is RIDICULOUSLY IMPROBABLE, RAMA! The chances of it coming to pass are so low, I doubt one can calculate them, even mathematically !RAMA, the borg has assimilated THOUSANDS of starfaring species - at least. Don't you think that, if it was so easy to stop, it would have been stopped long ago? The paradox virus from 'I, Borg', with its high chances of success against the borg (Picard&crew were certain it would work in 'I, Borg"), was better than anyone could realistically/reasonably hope for! The Federation couldn't have found a better weapon no matter how long it would have searched. That paradox was a godsend! Thousands upon thousands of advanced, assimilated species stand testimony to that. Waiting to find something bettrer is not only idiotic, but also suicidal (for your people) and criminal (for the BILLIONS Picard let die). About the so-called Federation Borg war you mentioned: RAMA, do you actually think that, if the borg would send - let's say 1000 cubes (by its standards, a small force) - the Federation could actually face it in war to a stalemate and then make peace with it?1000 cubes vs the Federation woldn't be a war - it would be a massacre! I doubt Starfleet would survive 2 weeks (and these only because the cubes need the time to reach starfllet's fleets). 1000 cubes vs the federation/the romulans/the klingons united will still be a massacre (but hey, now it will take take a whole month for the borg to wipe the alphans out ).That's the disparity in power between the federation and the borg! As for the borg making peace - well, good luck with those prayers of yours .
Last edited by ProtoAvatar; April 23 2010 at 09:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#143 | |
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
|
Commander
Location: the Dreadfort
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
They are not like the Klingons. The Borg don't believe in honour, and cannot be reasoned with if you show yourselves to be honourable. they are not like the Romulans. You can't sign a treaty with them, and let them hide behind the Neutral Zone. They aren't like the Cardassians. The Cardassian border war only ended since it was a stalemate, and continuing the fighting made no sense to either party. Stalemate between the Borg and the Federation is like a boxing match between Mike Tyson in his prime and a ninety year old man. no contest. They aren't like the Dominion. Even though the Founders of the Dominion detest all solids everywhere, they (for now) are willing to retreat to the Gamma Quadrant and stay out of the Alpha Quadrant's business. I say for now since I think one day they'll be back, but i'm digressing. Since the Borg are far superior technologically to the Federation, will not relent until they assimilate the Federation, and never understand the concept of co-existence or peace, then I can certainly understand Picard's reasoning at the start. In a sense it's a "them or us" scenario. Of course, there is the moral aspect of the argument, which has a strong case. But let's pose a hypothetical scenario. say in Best of Both Worlds, the Enterprise-D under Riker as a last resort warped into the Borg Cube (as they nearly did) and destroyed most of it. However, Locutus and some other Borg survived and beamed down to Earth, and started to assimilate humans on the planet. Would it be bad to infect the Borg with a virus then? What if they assimilate Earth, and then moved from one Federation member world to the next? What if they attacked Qo'nos, Romulus, Cardassia or Ferenginar? They could easily have done this, since to the Borg the Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians and Ferengi would all be good candidates for assimilation. In the good of the Alpha Quadrant, why not act? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Captain
Location: the universe
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
PICARD DID COMMIT GENOCIDE! Picard had a chance to stop the borg and he didn't use it, knowing that the borg are and will continue to kill BILLIONS, in an orgy of violence, death and suffering beyond comprehension... Picard either used the weapon against the borg, destroying the hive mind, or he didn't, in which case he, too, is responsible for the death of BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS at the hands of the borg. One can only choose the 'lesser evil' in this situation; there's no moral, 'white' choice. Picard allowed the borg to endure, staining his hands with the blood of BILLIONS. And why did Picard did this? He did it in order to delude himself that, even in this situation, he made the perfectly moral, 'white' choice. As for the BILLIONS the borg continued to kill, well, if Picard didn't have to see their faces as they died, he can keep telling himseld they're not his problem, that their blood is not staining his hands, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Was Picard wrong in I,Borg?
As it currently stands the Borg are a remote threat. But a threat that continues to test Federation defenses. So that does constitute them as an 'active' threat? I think it does. Only distance seems to keep the Borg from launching an all-out campaign against the Federation at the time of "I, Borg". From my standpoint using the virus is the "moral" thing to do. Sitting on a weapon that may essentially stop a "force of nature" from destroying civilizations is downright wrong. Of course nothing in life is guaranteed... so it may not work. But the distance that seems to keep the Borg at bay still exists
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| borg |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.












!
with it?
).
.






