RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,416
Posts: 5,506,438
Members: 25,130
Currently online: 415
Newest member: 2278

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 2 2010, 12:01 AM   #1
Ugly Sweater
Trekker4747
 
Ugly Sweater's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

The New York Times says the iPad is "too heavy."

LINK

How much does the iPad weigh? A pound a half.

Damn that is heavy!

If you are a octogenarian with arthritis and you weigh 76 lbs. And you have bone cancer. And you're really tired.

1.5 lbs as being "too heavy."
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Ugly Sweater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 01:41 AM   #2
CuttingEdge100
Commodore
 
CuttingEdge100's Avatar
 
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

That doesn't sound heavy at all...
CuttingEdge100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 01:48 AM   #3
Rķu rķu, chķu
Fleet Admiral
 
Rķu rķu, chķu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Rķu rķu, chķu's Twitter Profile
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

The reviewer sounds like a case of Grade A Whiner to me.
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Rķu rķu, chķu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:02 AM   #4
Arrqh
Vice Admiral
 
View Arrqh's Twitter Profile
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Um... seriously? This is a rant? And people are agreeing?

That was in the "techie" section where they were specifically comparing it to other e-readers. As they pointed out, the Kindle is only 10oz which makes the iPad 2.5x heavier. They also never said it was "too heavy" but instead that it starts to feel heavy in your hand after a while when using it as an e-reader.

If it's an e-reader you're after, then there are better choices then the iPad. That's what they were saying in the article. Context matters. Here is the actual passage and the only place the word "heavy" appears in the entire article:

There’s an e-book reader app, but it’s not going to rescue the newspaper and book industries (sorry, media pundits). The selection is puny (60,000 titles for now). You can’t read well in direct sunlight. At 1.5 pounds, the iPad gets heavy in your hand after awhile (the Kindle is 10 ounces). And you can’t read books from the Apple bookstore on any other machine — not even a Mac or iPhone.
__________________
Don't you know? The chances of a random object being a scone are about one in six.
Arrqh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:03 AM   #5
clint g
Admiral
 
Location: No where
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Well that settles it. The iPad is officialy....


FAIL
__________________
It's nothing personal, just business
clint g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:06 AM   #6
Ugly Sweater
Trekker4747
 
Ugly Sweater's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Arrqh wrote: View Post
Um... seriously? This is a rant? And people are agreeing?

That was in the "techie" section where they were specifically comparing it to other e-readers. As they pointed out, the Kindle is only 10oz which makes the iPad 2.5x heavier. They also never said it was "too heavy" but instead that it starts to feel heavy in your hand after a while when using it as an e-reader.

If it's an e-reader you're after, then there are better choices then the iPad. That's what they were saying in the article. Context matters. Here is the actual passage and the only place the word "heavy" appears in the entire article:

There’s an e-book reader app, but it’s not going to rescue the newspaper and book industries (sorry, media pundits). The selection is puny (60,000 titles for now). You can’t read well in direct sunlight. At 1.5 pounds, the iPad gets heavy in your hand after awhile (the Kindle is 10 ounces). And you can’t read books from the Apple bookstore on any other machine — not even a Mac or iPhone.
If a pound and a half "gets heavy" for you after any length of time you've got some serious muscular issues.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Ugly Sweater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:08 AM   #7
clint g
Admiral
 
Location: No where
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

The whole not being able to read the books on the Mac issue seems like a bit more of a problem to me. It'll probably be fixed by the end of the month though.
__________________
It's nothing personal, just business
clint g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:10 AM   #8
Arrqh
Vice Admiral
 
View Arrqh's Twitter Profile
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
If a pound and a half "gets heavy" for you after any length of time you've got some serious muscular issues.
The point is, since you missed it in both my post and the actual article, that there are better devices for use as an e-reader then the iPad. In a mobile device that you use for long periods of time, weight matters.

And again, at no point did the author actually say it was "too heavy." Did you even read the whole article? Because the overall tone is actually positive and at one point he actually referes to the iPad as "light". He only calls it heavy compared to other e-readers and this is absolutely correct. So again: seriously?
__________________
Don't you know? The chances of a random object being a scone are about one in six.
Arrqh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 02:11 AM   #9
Rķu rķu, chķu
Fleet Admiral
 
Rķu rķu, chķu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Rķu rķu, chķu's Twitter Profile
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Ah, but the burning question is, will Star Trek e-books be available for the iPad?
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Rķu rķu, chķu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 03:45 AM   #10
Lindley
Moderator with a Soul
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Of of curiosity, anyone know the average weight of an MMPB?
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly.
"So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!"
-Torg, Sluggy Freelance
Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 03:52 AM   #11
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

[QUOTE=Arrqh;3965179]
There’s an e-book reader app, but it’s not going to rescue the newspaper and book industries (sorry, media pundits). The selection is puny (60,000 titles for now). You can’t read well in direct sunlight. At 1.5 pounds, the iPad gets heavy in your hand after awhile (the Kindle is 10 ounces). And you can’t read books from the Apple bookstore on any other machine — not even a Mac or iPhone.
And, in total, that's a good strong argument against choosing the iPad as a e-book reader.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 04:00 AM   #12
AdmiralGarak
Rear Admiral
 
AdmiralGarak's Avatar
 
Location: TrekBBS, apparently
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

The reviewer on CNN also said the weight bothered him after a while.
AdmiralGarak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 04:14 AM   #13
Ugly Sweater
Trekker4747
 
Ugly Sweater's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

I say again, if a pound and half weight bothers you after any stretch of time you've got issues.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Ugly Sweater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 04:17 AM   #14
Flavius
Vice Admiral
 
Flavius's Avatar
 
Location: Flavius in Eternal Spring
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Apple has now made available the guided tours.

http://www.apple.com/ipad/guided-tours/

Avoiding the carpal tunnel syndrome (and the like) is included

Seriously, I don't think that the Kindle(s) are going to become roadkill instantly, but it's hard to fathom why somebody would choose a Kindle over the iPad, a one-trick-pony over a multi-talent?

It's a different story, for sure, if you already own a Kindle and a laptop.
__________________
My Blog at Tumblr.com
Flavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2010, 04:23 AM   #15
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: BOOM! A shot into the iPad's heart.

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
I say again, if a pound and half weight bothers you after any stretch of time you've got issues.
Say whatever you like. If I say that "if buying a real book bothers you, you've got issues" it's as valid and makes as much sense as your assertion.

I swear, the lengths people will go to, to defend Apple's junk...
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ipad

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.