Uma Thurman: Genre babe of the week #8 (Feb. 2010)

[Nardpuncher]

Hermiod wrote:

---

When I voted thumbs down I was expecting a stream of "are you mad?" posts in reply.

Nope, you're good.
Same stuff goes for Cameron Diaz...her and Uma are the kind that kind of look good if they're 20 feet away and you don't have your glasses on and you've had 3 beers.
They seem to get an automatic pass from many because they're blonde.

[Nick Ryder]

She's one of those actresses that in some outfits and the right pose or lighting she looks kinda hot, but in others... she's really not all that attractive. I think its just the way her face is shaped and even the way she moves sometimes she's just not attractive to me.

I voted sideways - she can be fairly sexy but I think it takes a lot of effort LOL

[Othello]

Down. Easily one of the most overrated women in Hollywood. I really don't think she's all that pretty at all.

[Temis the Vorta]

Wow, guys are weird. I would have thought Uma Thurman would be unanimously thumbs up. She's a classic beauty, whereas a lot of the women who get good scores in these polls are utterly interchangeable Barbie doll types and frankly boring looking.

[BrotherBenny]

Up, cos she looks good in almost everything...

[Hermiod]

Temis the Vorta wrote:

---

Wow, guys are weird. I would have thought Uma Thurman would be unanimously thumbs up. She's a classic beauty, whereas a lot of the women who get good scores in these polls are utterly interchangeable Barbie doll types and frankly boring looking.

I don't know about everyone else, but my thumbs down comes from the fact that I just don't like her.

If everyone else who entered has a horrible accident between now and March and thus I end up winning Aragorn's March Madness competition you definitely won't be getting any generic blondes for my six choices.

I wouldn't call Scarlet Johansson, Monica Bellucci or Olivia Wilde "interchangeable". The latter is one of the few subjects Megan Fox and I agree upon.

[Asbo Zaprudder]

Unfortunately, Uma Thurman's needy and clingy performance in "My Super Ex-Girlfriend" was so good that it makes guys think that's how she behaves in real life.

[Hermiod]

Great Mambo Chicken wrote:

---

Unfortunately, Uma Thurman's needy and clingy performance in "My Super Ex-Girlfriend" was so good that it makes guys think that's how she behaves in real life.

Hey, let's not forget the comedy domestic violence either!

[Asbo Zaprudder]

My penis!

[Trekker4747]

Sideways. Hell, a generous sideways.

As far as physical looks I'd probably say she's the "worst" babe we've ever had. She's certainly by no means ugly, but I dunno. She's never done anything for me accept in the rarest of cases.

[Base_Delta_Zero]

Finally.

Thumbs down.

Temis the Vorta wrote:

---

Wow, guys are weird. I would have thought Uma Thurman would be unanimously thumbs up. She's a classic beauty, whereas a lot of the women who get good scores in these polls are utterly interchangeable Barbie doll types and frankly boring looking.

Did they change the definition of classic beauty when I wasn't paying attention? Does it now equal fugly? Cause her and Maggie G. are neck-and-neck right now over who hit more branches of the ugly tree on the way down.

[drasche]

Her topless scene in Dangerous Liaisons with John Malkovich left me speechless.

She might be odd-looking but that's definitely a quality for me. I hate dolls.

Up.

[Daneel]

She certainly has a unique look, and I can see the appeal, but while I don't find her by any means ugly, she's just never really done anything special for me. Sideways.

I did quite like her as the Bride, though.

[Rageforthemachine]

Out of curiousity does anybody remeber the lowest score a babe has ever gotten? Cause Uma is not even hitting 50% right now.

[Aragorn]

Patricia Arquette last year. 25% maybe?