Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) - Page 3

Gary Mitchell · August 15 2009, 03:55 AM

Scout101 wrote:

Couldn't post enough thumbsups to properly express this one. Love this girl!

Agreed. 2 droolies, too.

Skywalker · August 15 2009, 04:39 AM

Aragorn wrote:

Hmmm... she seems to be underperforming here. Might not even make the playoffs.

This cannot stand.

Starbreaker · August 15 2009, 04:49 AM

Those photos don't do her justice. I love her!

Trekker4747 · August 15 2009, 11:32 AM

Aragorn wrote:

Hmmm... she seems to be underperforming here. Might not even make the playoffs.

She's at 78%

Scout101 · August 15 2009, 11:56 AM

yeah, that's pretty messed up. Then again, this board's demographics make for some intersting choices sometimes. You'd think it would result in 3 thumbs up for anything remotely female, but sometimes the results are just odd.

Honestly, if you're voting "down" or "sideways" on this girl, I'd LOVE to see what you're taking home instead, because she's georgous! And not only that, but has a pretty high degree of the 'could happen/ available girl" obtainability, as opposed to a generic, out of reach supermodel.

CorporalClegg · August 15 2009, 05:21 PM

I'll take two.

Thumbs Up!

Aragorn · August 15 2009, 06:03 PM

It's almost always the thumbs sideways votes that do them in.

Othello · August 15 2009, 07:10 PM

That's definitely a thumbs up in my book!!

Othello · August 15 2009, 07:12 PM

Aragorn wrote:

Hmmm... she seems to be underperforming here. Might not even make the playoffs.

There's no accounting for taste. If she doesn't make it it's a travesty.

Othello · August 15 2009, 07:15 PM

Aragorn wrote:

Hmmm... she seems to be underperforming here. Might not even make the playoffs.

Can we get a "if the playoffs started today" update in a separate thread maybe?? Kinda like they do on Sports Center for the playoffs...

gblews · August 15 2009, 08:16 PM

So sexy, in that "granola look" kind of way, and so cute. One of the few actors who can make me watch a movie all the way through that would not hold my interest if she weren't in it.

Thumbs way up.

Skywalker · August 15 2009, 08:46 PM

Aragorn wrote:

It's almost always the thumbs sideways votes that do them in.

"Thumbs sideways" is so lame anyways. Too wishy-washy.

Daneel · August 15 2009, 08:57 PM

^^^^
I don't know... I find it useful. For me, there are many degrees of attraction. There are plenty of women I find reasonably nice-looking, if not quite desirable. Women whose looks I can appreciate, even if they aren't exactly the type I'd normally be attracted to. In such cases, "thumbs sideways" is appropriate. Heck, sometimes I wish there were more than three options!

Aragorn, is there a certain number of women who need to be in the playoffs, or is it just anyone who gets higher than... what, 75%? 80%?

Gil T.Azell · August 15 2009, 08:58 PM

A beautiful woman

Trekker4747 · August 15 2009, 09:23 PM

Aragorn wrote:

It's almost always the thumbs sideways votes that do them in.

I still question your logic of a thumbs-sideways counting as a "thumbs down" (or at the very least not counting FOR the contestant.)

If that's the case why does the sideways even exist if it can't help the person? Why isn't a "thumbs down" worth 0 points, a side ways worth 1 point and an up worth 2 points?

Everyone who says something like "Cute, but nothing special: sideways" in "reality" is hurting the entrant more than "helping."

I call shenanigans on this whole process!

Shenanigans!

SHENANIGANS!!!!

View Poll Results: Rachel McAdams
Thumbs Up	91	79.82%
Thumbs Down	3	2.63%
Thumbs Sideways	20	17.54%
Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll

August 15 2009, 04:49 AM	#33
Starbreaker Fleet Admiral	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) Those photos don't do her justice. I love her!

August 15 2009, 11:56 AM	#35
Scout101 Admiral Location: Rhode Island, USA	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) yeah, that's pretty messed up. Then again, this board's demographics make for some intersting choices sometimes. You'd think it would result in 3 thumbs up for anything remotely female, but sometimes the results are just odd. Honestly, if you're voting "down" or "sideways" on this girl, I'd LOVE to see what you're taking home instead, because she's georgous! And not only that, but has a pretty high degree of the 'could happen/ available girl" obtainability, as opposed to a generic, out of reach supermodel. __________________ Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey STO: @JScout33

August 15 2009, 05:21 PM	#36
CorporalClegg Vice Admiral Location: Nuevo México	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) I'll take two. Thumbs Up!

August 15 2009, 06:03 PM	#37
Aragorn Admiral	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) It's almost always the thumbs sideways votes that do them in.

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US

August 15 2009, 07:10 PM	#38
Othello Commodore	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) That's definitely a thumbs up in my book!!

August 15 2009, 08:16 PM	#41
gblews Rear Admiral Location: So. Cal.	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) So sexy, in that "granola look" kind of way, and so cute. One of the few actors who can make me watch a movie all the way through that would not hold my interest if she weren't in it. Thumbs way up. __________________ Duckman: I'll never forget the last thing my father said to me... Cornfed: "Careful son, I don't think the safety's on"? Duckman: BEFORE THAT!!!

August 15 2009, 08:57 PM	#43
Daneel Rear Admiral Location: Toronto	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) ^^^^ I don't know... I find it useful. For me, there are many degrees of attraction. There are plenty of women I find reasonably nice-looking, if not quite desirable. Women whose looks I can appreciate, even if they aren't exactly the type I'd normally be attracted to. In such cases, "thumbs sideways" is appropriate. Heck, sometimes I wish there were more than three options! Aragorn, is there a certain number of women who need to be in the playoffs, or is it just anyone who gets higher than... what, 75%? 80%?

August 15 2009, 08:58 PM	#44
Gil T.Azell Rear Admiral Location: On the Left Coast	Re: Rachel McAdams: Genre babe of the week #34 (Aug. 2009) A beautiful woman __________________ You're not really Drunk until you're speaking fluent Ozzy Osboune