RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,160
Posts: 5,344,222
Members: 24,600
Currently online: 670
Newest member: Lord Galen

TrekToday headlines

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Retro Review: In the Pale Moonlight
By: Michelle on Jul 19

Trek Beach Towel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 18

Two New Starships Collection Releases
By: T'Bonz on Jul 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 3 2009, 01:40 PM   #1
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Annoying (yet complicated) Timeline Confusions

I’ve heard a few people say that the new Star Trek timeline was somehow different to the ‘prime’ one prior to Nero’s incursion in 2233.

They say that, since in this new timeline Picard and co.’s adventures either don’t happen or “happen differently”, all the times previous Treks go back in time (like First Contact, City of the Edge of Forever or Time’s Arrow) didn’t happen either, thus changing the past as well. This is wrong.

If it were the way things worked in Trek’s version of time travel, then Nero would have erased himself and Spock Prime the minute Vulcan was destroyed – without Vulcan in the future the chain of events would completely change (for starters Red Matter, which created the black hole sending him back in the first place, was a Vulcan invention).

In most Treks (with a couple of exceptions - it’s hardy consistent in these things), what happens in the past stays there.

Theoretically, if STXI Kirk went back to the 1980’s, he might bump into STIV Kirk. Sounds crazy? From STXI Kirk’s perspective, STIV Kirk is an orphan of a future that no longer exists. No idea what STIV Kirk would make of STXI Kirk (“WTF?” might sum it up).

You can see this in a couple of Voyager and Enterprise episodes, where alternate versions of Captain “I never experienced that timeline” Braxton and Crewman Daniels visit the crews, often in the same episode.

All that said, although Enterprise technically ‘happened’ in the new timeline, I can’t see Paramount wanting to tie their successful new film franchise to the failed TV series too much. And I’m 100% sure Captain Archer was *not* this Kirk’s childhood hero (or the old one, for that matter!).
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2009, 01:52 AM   #2
L1A1 Rocker
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Annoying (yet complicated) Timeline Confusions

I've seen a couple of graphics that explained the time line. Perhaps someone that has them would be kind enough to post them?
L1A1 Rocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
timeline

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.