RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,686
Posts: 5,430,509
Members: 24,830
Currently online: 366
Newest member: Old Man 51


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie
A+ 49 16.78%
A 66 22.60%
A- 56 19.18%
B+ 34 11.64%
B 24 8.22%
B- 16 5.48%
C+ 13 4.45%
C 9 3.08%
C- 5 1.71%
D+ 2 0.68%
D 9 3.08%
D- 5 1.71%
F 4 1.37%
Voters: 292. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 27 2009, 11:04 AM   #886
Emher
Admiral
 
Emher's Avatar
 
Location: Emher
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Emher Send a message via Yahoo to Emher
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Dream wrote: View Post
Emher wrote: View Post
Atariboy wrote: View Post
And it seems I'm the only person who doesn't have a problem with a song about sex actually playing during a sex scene... or do people just not pay attention to the lyrics???
The problem I had with that scene is I initially didn't know how to view it. Is it a serious sex scene, is a funny sex scene? On one hand the music suggest one thing but Snider shot it too well so I keep thinking it's supposed to be sexy.
It was supposed to be seen as ridiculous in the comic. Dan needed to wear his Nite Owl costume just to get it up. That isn't supposed to be normal.

The comic and movie also had the random fire shooting out of the ship scene at the end.
Well I know hat after reading the comic after seeing the film. But that's sorta my point, the movie should be able to stand on it's own, and mostly it does that, but that scene is still unclear about it's intentions me thinks.
__________________
"I am who I am. Someone has to be."-Brendan Gleeson as Reynald in Kingdom of Heaven. - Emher
Emher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2009, 08:16 PM   #887
John Clark
Commodore
 
John Clark's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Just finished watching it. I haven't read the graphic novel and thought the movie might be overhyped (the trailer didn't overly impress me).

I did enjoy the movie overall
__________________
If there's a justification for my actions right now, it's this: I have gone completely mad
John Clark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2009, 01:58 AM   #888
DarthPipes
Rear Admiral
 
DarthPipes's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

About the deleted scenes, Patrick Wilson is fantastic in the scene where he learns Hollis was killed. You could really feel him going over the edge when he yells "Tell your friends they're dead! I'm going to wipe out this entire rathole neighborhood!"
DarthPipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2009, 08:13 AM   #889
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

I just finished watching the DC. I enjoyed the TC, but there was something about it that just felt slightly "off." Most of that was fixed with the DC, which restored a lot of good stuff and really fixed some of the pacing issues that kind of plagued the TC.

My favorite additions were probably Rorshach's line about Veidt ("Possible homosexual? Must investigate further." ), and Hollis Mason's death (poor guy) and Dan's reaction to it (Patrick Wilson's performance in this movie is kind of underrated, IMO). I'm still not sure what Zack Snyder was thinking with the choice of music for Dan and Laurie's sex scene. And Nixon's nose is still ridiculous (though that seemed intentional to me).

I kind of wish I had waited until the Ultimate Edition comes out in December, but I'm not sure if meshing Tales of the Black Freighter into the movie will work as well as it did in the comic. And the movie's already long enough as it is. Maybe I'll rent it.
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 29 2009, 12:48 AM   #890
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Skywalker wrote: View Post
And Nixon's nose is still ridiculous (though that seemed intentional to me).
I really wish Frank Langella had played the older Nixon in Watchmen. I watched Frost/Nixon recently and thought Langella was incredible in the role as the former president. I just can't take the actor that plays the Nixon in Watchmen seriously.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 29 2009, 01:32 AM   #891
DarthPipes
Rear Admiral
 
DarthPipes's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Patrick Wilson's performance in this movie is kind of underrated, IMO
Yeah, Wilson was terrific. I think Jeffery Dean Morgan as The Comedian was the best thing in this movie but Wilson's character felt so true to the comic that it felt like he literally walked off the pages.

That music choice for the Dan/Laurie sex scene was an odd one indeed but I never considered that moment to be dramatically serious in the book. It was meant to be silly. Dan was able to get it up again after putting on his costume and just wanted to **** his bitch. That's pretty much how I read it.
DarthPipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 29 2009, 03:25 AM   #892
Davros
Fleet Admiral
 
Davros's Avatar
 
Location: Kaled bunker, Skaro
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

I'm glad I picked up the Director's Cut.
__________________
"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society," -Oliver Wendell Holmes
Davros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2 2009, 01:37 AM   #893
Buck Rogers
Captain
 
Buck Rogers's Avatar
 
Location: Maryland,USA
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Well I got a chance to see it on demand via Comcast cable,and some of the violence i
could do with out as some of full frontal nude scenes,but It to me wasn't worth the overall hype.
I did like the fact it was alternative history tho,and that the 16th amendment never occurred resulting in Presidential terms of office being unlimited like Nixon having three terms of office.
However some please explain to me why the Comedian was shown to be the shooter at grassy knoll during the Kennedy assassination.
I laughed at the end when the local newspaper had no news to print even though Ronald Reagan was running for President in 88, the reporter decided to check out Rorschach's journal toward the end of the film.
Also when does a hero become a villain at the end unless he was being portrayed as an anti-hero in the beginning of the film.
Well enough ranting on my part.

Good night all

Signed

Buck Rogers
__________________
"Roads we're going, we don't need roads"
By Doc Brown
Back to the Future part 2
Buck Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2 2009, 04:25 AM   #894
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Saw the theatrical cut again, since the director's cut isn't out on DVD, at least at Blockbuster. It hasn't gotten better since I saw it in the theatre--it's gotten worse. Snyder nails the visual look of the comic, but seems to miss the dramatic point of the book all the same. In one sense, this is good. Snyder makes the ending far better and more plausible than the book. But it still isn't plausible. With Doctor Manhattan leaving the Earth, the incentive for peace to be mantained isn't there. Certainly a man who is a God, or a man who is the smartest in the world should realize that they kill a lot of people over something that won't last long.

Most of the performances are terrible, which convinces me Snyder doesn't know how to work with actors. Haley's Rorschach is one note. All of the female performers are light weights (and the old age make-up on them is ineffective). Ozyman-what's his name is terrible, whoever the actor is. Nixon is a bad caricature (not even a good one).

I do want to finish reading the book completely through now, though.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2 2009, 04:28 AM   #895
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Buck Rogers wrote: View Post
I did like the fact it was alternative history tho,and that the 16th amendment never occurred resulting in Presidential terms of office being unlimited like Nixon having three terms of office.
Or repealed, which seems more likely.

Buck Rogers wrote: View Post
However some please explain to me why the Comedian was shown to be the shooter at grassy knoll during the Kennedy assassination.
He also flat out implies he bumped off Woodward and Bernstein, so Watergate was never played out. Clearly he's working with Nixon and his cronies, even back at JFK's assassination. The implication being that getting rid of JFK allows Nixon to get elected in the first place (don't forget that JFK beat Nixon in 1960, so there's a revenge motive).

Buck Rogers wrote: View Post
Also when does a hero become a villain at the end unless he was being portrayed as an anti-hero in the beginning of the film.
When your story is about moral ambiguity.


One funny thing I noticed...I bought the Dirctor's Cut, and the second disc has the "digital copy", but the latter appears to be the theatrical cut...so you get both.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2 2009, 04:34 AM   #896
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

If only the movie had ambiguity. Veidt's inclinations are far too obvious throughout. I don't know if it's a bad performance, or bad direction, or both. But it's the opposite of what the film needed.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2 2009, 05:09 AM   #897
DarthPipes
Rear Admiral
 
DarthPipes's Avatar
 
Re: WATCHMEN - Movie Discussion and Grading (SPOILERS)

Harvey wrote: View Post
If only the movie had ambiguity. Veidt's inclinations are far too obvious throughout. I don't know if it's a bad performance, or bad direction, or both. But it's the opposite of what the film needed.
I liked Matthew Goode's performance better the second time I saw it but he's not helped by the fact that his character's "evilness" is not very subtley. Giving him a foreign accent was kind of a dead giveaway too although strangly it seems less pronounced on the DVD.

Malin Ackerman's performance is a little better too although she's still the weak link of the cast. Her character was badly hurt by the virtual elimination of her animosity towards Edward Blake. When it is revealed that Blake is Laurie's father in the movie, it has no dramatic punch at all because Laurie barely mentions Blake at all in the film, let alone hates him.

The 22nd Amendment is repealed in the world of Watchmen, allowing Nixon to keep running. Having won Vietnam in this world, he enjoys enourmous public support. Manhatten's presence changed everything in this timeline.

About the change at the end, with Manhatten being blamed for everything. I can see this forcing the worlds to work together but no way in hell would people be "holding hands and singing" with the U.S. if Manhatten had really done this action. They might work with the U.S. but they would likely be very bitter that the American government's ultimate weapon caused so much damage.
DarthPipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
watchmen

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.