|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Literature "...Good words. That's where ideas begin." |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: India
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
Well yes, the UFP is all about exploring in the open.... but its nice to know that the option exists to "hide in the shadows" to protect the ship and its crew and use this advantage in times of conflict. The Romulans can't always be relied upon to give their tacit approval for the use of cloaks if the UFP were to have a conflict with another group. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Captain
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: India
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
I'm assuming it is. It would really help if someone could get their hands on the text of the Treaty, assuming of course it has been written. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: on the Enterprise
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Admiral
Location: The Red Flag: May Day 2013
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
Thus, even if the Romulan Star Empire repealed the Treaty of Algeron, it would still be binding upon the Federation, just like any piece of domestic Federation law, until the Federation repealed it. Personally, I think it would be irrational for the Federation not to repeal the Treaty in the post-Typhon Pact landscape; the RSE is in no position to attack the Federation unilaterally (which was the original reason the Federation agreed to ban cloaks in the Treaty: to reduce tensions with the Romulans, as established in The Lost Era: Serpents Among the Ruins), and the rest of the Pact does not have a Treaty with the Federation banning the cloaking device. Meanwhile, the Federation is allied with the Imperial Romulan State, which opens up new avenues of trade and scientific exchange for developing new cloaking technologies -- and they aren't likely to attack the UFP for developing cloaking technologies. Meanwhile, the very existence of the Pact means that Starfleet Intelligence is going to need to step up its espionage missions, and Starfleet is going to need to be able to keep up with its cloak-capable Khitomer Accord partners (especially if the other Khitomer members, like the Cardassians and Ferengi, decide they want cloaks, too). It would be irrational for the Federation not to repeal the Treaty of Algeron and allow Starfleet Intelligence to operate a fleet of cloak-capable ships for use in reconnaissance and espionage missions, particularly agent insertions and extractions.
__________________
This dream must end, this world must know: We all depend on the beast below. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Warped off into the sunset. With fond memories of most of you, and not a little sorrow at leaving.
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile and nothing can grow there; too much, the best of us is washed away. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Warped off into the sunset. With fond memories of most of you, and not a little sorrow at leaving.
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile and nothing can grow there; too much, the best of us is washed away. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: on the Enterprise
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Admiral
Location: The Red Flag: May Day 2013
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
This dream must end, this world must know: We all depend on the beast below. |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Warped off into the sunset. With fond memories of most of you, and not a little sorrow at leaving.
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile and nothing can grow there; too much, the best of us is washed away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Writer
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Includes purchasing links for Only Superhuman, on sale now! Updated 12/30/12 with annotations for the novel. Written Worlds -- My blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: India
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
Yep. Now that the UFP would most likely repeal the Treaty of Algeron, they can go into developing cloak tech full fledged. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: on the Enterprise
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Warped off into the sunset. With fond memories of most of you, and not a little sorrow at leaving.
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
__________________
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile and nothing can grow there; too much, the best of us is washed away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
|
Re: UFP & Cloaking devices (post-singular destiny with spoilers)
|
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| cloaks, federation |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















