RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,353
Posts: 5,502,915
Members: 25,121
Currently online: 617
Newest member: MsMarrielle

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
Excellent 706 62.70%
Above Average 213 18.92%
Average 84 7.46%
Below Average 46 4.09%
Poor 77 6.84%
Voters: 1126. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 10 2009, 05:59 AM   #1186
mysticgeek
Lieutenant
 
mysticgeek's Avatar
 
Location: MN
View mysticgeek's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

@jazzstick:

The entire movie made me think! I kept thinking "Why is Hollywood using mall-core pretty boys in an attempt to make Star Trek trendy??"

Oh yeah ... the money.
mysticgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:01 AM   #1187
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

jazzstick wrote: View Post
Nimoy's acting was very very forced and this Spock was a bit out of Character!
Nimoy didn't think so.


J.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:02 AM   #1188
jazzstick
Lieutenant Commander
 
jazzstick's Avatar
 
Location: The Darkside of The Moon
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

J. Allen wrote: View Post
jazzstick wrote: View Post
Nimoy's acting was very very forced and this Spock was a bit out of Character!
Nimoy didn't think so.


J.
So...?
__________________
Sokath - his eyes uncovered.
jazzstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:03 AM   #1189
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

mysticgeek wrote: View Post
I kept thinking "Why is Hollywood using mall-core pretty boys in an attempt to make Star Trek trendy??"
Because three-quarters of the "mall-core pretty" cast are better actors than the originals were, for starts.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:03 AM   #1190
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

jazzstick wrote: View Post
J. Allen wrote: View Post
jazzstick wrote: View Post
Nimoy's acting was very very forced and this Spock was a bit out of Character!
Nimoy didn't think so.


J.
So...?
Nothing. I just think he's far more authoritative in whether he got his own character right. Your mileage may vary.

J.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:03 AM   #1191
Borgminister
Moderator
 
Location: California
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

mysticgeek wrote: View Post
@jazzstick:

The entire movie made me think! I kept thinking "Why is Hollywood using mall-core pretty boys in an attempt to make Star Trek trendy??"

Oh yeah ... the money.
Should they have used overweight octogenarians instead in an effort to lose money?

Borgminister is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:04 AM   #1192
cyberengland
Ensign
 
Location: Saint James, Missouri
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

You know, this is like experiencing the legendary broken record yet again...
I remember when Leonard Nimoy was a guest on the Today show, and had a very
complimentary interview with Gene Shalit about the new Star Trek: The Motion
Picture. 24 hours later Shalit trashed the new movie. Yet the new movie went
on to make a load of money for its day...

I remember when Next Generation was about to debut, and the Trek fans and
critics and naysayers were saying "It's not Trek because there's no Kirk and
Spock and McCoy". It lasted more than twice as long as the original series,
and wasn't even on a network...

I remember when Deep Space Nine was about to debut, and the Trek fans and
critics and naysayers were saying "It's not Trek because it's not on a
starship, and is dark and moody". It lasted seven seasons and was also a hit
in syndication...

I remember when Generations was about to debut on the big screen, and there
was all this talk by the Trek fans and critics and naysayers about Kirk
dying, officially passing the torch to the Next Gen cast for movies, and
Trek fans saying that the movies would fail because there was no Kirk and
Spock and McCoy on the big screen...

I remember when Voyager was about to debut, and Trek fans and critics and
naysayers were calling it "Kirk Lite" and such because it was returning to
the concept of a starship on the frontier with no contact with Starfleet or
familiar planets. It lasted seven seasons and was often one of the top show
on the new UPN network...

I remember when Enterprise was about to debut, and the Trek fans and critics
and naysayers were saying that it would destroy canon by doing things that
contradicted history as filmed in all the preceding series and movies.
Having watched every episode and looking for such contradictions, I posit
that while canon may have been brushed against, there was no breaking of
canon. In fact, I really enjoyed it because aside from the novels there was
no "official" history of how the Federation was founded. I just wish UPN
would have given it more time because it was finally making its strides...

I remember the trashing Nemesis got. I believe that had the movie not opened
against James Bond, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter at the same time, it
would have done so much better at the domestic box office. I also remember
reading reports that in other countries where it opened without this same
competition, it was number one outside the US.

Through all the decades I have experienced and witnessed constant bashing
and trashing of Star Trek, first in the media and then the Internet, I have
remained a fan. I ignore all the constant trashing and bashing by people who
have nothing better to do than say "it's a waste of money" or "it's not
Shatner" or fill-in-your-blank-of-choice. My wife and I had an incredible
time today at the theatre, and were completely and totally tied to the big
screen by the non-stop action, initial introductions of the Original Series
characters in this alternate timeline (which is so stated and explained
within the movie itself). This is one of those extremely rare movies that we
enjoyed so much that we will go back to the theatre AGAIN...

In my opinion, this movie is a sequel AND a reboot. Leonard Nimoy's Spock
brings with him the knowledge and memories of the original timeline to the
altered timeline counterparts of his crew. Because events in this movie are
indeed in contradiction to established canon, but established canon is
acknowledged, and at the end Nimoy's Spock is still a part of this new
timeline, both timelines logically must be intact. Who is to say that the
event that began this movie did not begin in a parellel universe (a la
"Mirror Mirror")?

Be logical, people. Enjoy the movie for what it is: a return to the Original
cast and crew to find themselves and become the team they are destined to
be... but in their OWN timeline and/or parallel universe.
cyberengland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:04 AM   #1193
jazzstick
Lieutenant Commander
 
jazzstick's Avatar
 
Location: The Darkside of The Moon
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

J. Allen wrote: View Post
jazzstick wrote: View Post
J. Allen wrote: View Post

Nimoy didn't think so.


J.
So...?
Nothing. I just think he's far more authoritative in whether he got his own character right. Your mileage may vary.

J.
True but it still seemed forced! But then again your mileage may vary too!
__________________
Sokath - his eyes uncovered.
jazzstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:06 AM   #1194
mysticgeek
Lieutenant
 
mysticgeek's Avatar
 
Location: MN
View mysticgeek's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Borgminister wrote: View Post

Should they have used overweight octogenarians instead in an effort to lose money?

You completely miss my sarcasm

Last edited by M'Sharak; May 10 2009 at 07:02 AM. Reason: quote tags corrected
mysticgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:07 AM   #1195
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

jazzstick wrote: View Post
J. Allen wrote: View Post
jazzstick wrote: View Post

So...?
Nothing. I just think he's far more authoritative in whether he got his own character right. Your mileage may vary.

J.
True but it still seemed forced! But then again your mileage may vary too!
To be fair, I was also extremely excited to see Spock on the big screen. Nemesis had been my first Star Trek movie that I had seen in the theater (I've been a huge fan since I was 4, but always missed the movies while they were in theaters). So for me, it was just epic, epic, epic.

J.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:07 AM   #1196
mysticgeek
Lieutenant
 
mysticgeek's Avatar
 
Location: MN
View mysticgeek's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Yes Nimoy's performance was very forced and didn't fit in well imho
mysticgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:08 AM   #1197
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

mysticgeek wrote: View Post
Borgminister wrote: View Post

Should they have used overweight octogenarians instead in an effort to lose money?

You completely miss my sarcasm
Or was unimpressed by it.

Last edited by M'Sharak; May 10 2009 at 07:02 AM. Reason: quote tags corrected
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:09 AM   #1198
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

cyberengland wrote: View Post
I remember when Voyager was about to debut, and Trek fans and critics and naysayers were calling it "Kirk Lite" and such because it was returning to the concept of a starship on the frontier with no contact with Starfleet or familiar planets. It lasted seven seasons and was often one of the top show on the new UPN network...
Voyager was Trek Lite and the only reason it lasted seven seasons was because it was on UPN's first seven seasons of existence. If Enterprise had come first, it would've lasted seven seasons and Voyager four.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:09 AM   #1199
pookha
Admiral
 
pookha's Avatar
 
Location: pookha
View pookha's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

mysticgeek wrote: View Post
@jazzstick:

The entire movie made me think! I kept thinking "Why is Hollywood using mall-core pretty boys in an attempt to make Star Trek trendy??"

Oh yeah ... the money.

that they could act and capture the essence of the characters..

no that couldnt be it.
__________________
avatar by
?
pookha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10 2009, 06:09 AM   #1200
mysticgeek
Lieutenant
 
mysticgeek's Avatar
 
Location: MN
View mysticgeek's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Dennis wrote: View Post
mysticgeek wrote: View Post

You completely miss my sarcasm
Or was unimpressed by it.
or frightened by it. Or void of all emotion over it.

Last edited by M'Sharak; May 10 2009 at 07:03 AM. Reason: quote tags corrected
mysticgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
grading & discussion, parallel star trek, vulcan

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.