RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,711
Posts: 5,431,948
Members: 24,834
Currently online: 559
Newest member: fanficfan


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 30 2009, 09:28 PM   #1501
gh4chiefs
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Kruge wrote: View Post
gh4chiefs wrote: View Post
Well it seems like a reasonable guess. My other guess would be that they're like me, trying to forget Nemesis ever happened.

Seriously

If you actually care

As depicted in Countdown

In 2387, Picard is Ambassador to Vulcan, Worf is a General in the Klingon Empire, and LaForge designs starships on his own...they figured out a way to download Data's katra into B-4's lifeless, retarded body, and he is now Cap'n of the Enterprise E, thus negating the various ethical questions of destroying one life-form to save another.
Thanks for that update, I guess I'm not really surprised.
__________________
Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.
gh4chiefs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 03:46 AM   #1502
seekertwo
Commander
 
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

SiddFinch1 wrote: View Post
Is Vulcan blown to bits or is it destroyed in a way in which the planet could have been sucked into an alternate universe timeline as Nero and Spock were?
Good question....could Vulcan disappear and reappear like that planet on DS9.....or could it randomly bounce around the universe like a planet I read about in a Star Wars book?....

Last edited by M'Sharak; May 1 2009 at 05:43 AM. Reason: tag fixed
seekertwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 06:19 AM   #1503
trekfan
Cadet
 
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Just saw the move in Seattle at a pre-screen. Wow, a very awesome movie. Good action, nicely paced and funny. I give it an A-.
trekfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:38 AM   #1504
Dac
Commodore
 
Dac's Avatar
 
Location: The Essex wastes...
View Dac's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Dac
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

SiddFinch1 wrote: View Post
Is Vulcan blown to bits or is it destroyed in a way in which the planet could have been sucked into an alternate universe timeline as Nero and Spock were?

Is it specified what year the main events take place/how old Kirk is? From what i read Spock prime was confused that Kirk was not Captain yet- does that mean the movie is in 2266?
Vulcan is blown to smithereens. Unless someone has mega industrial strength super glue and alot of spare time (not to mention knowing where and when it got sucked to) it aient coming back save for more time travel.

The opening scene takes place in 2233 - This is where Kirk is born. When we see him as an adult he is 25, making it 2258, and he then spends 3 years at the Academy before boarding the Enterprise, meaning the film should take place around 2260 (Give or take a few months).
Dac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 11:55 AM   #1505
Dick Whitman
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Behind the mask of Donald Draper
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Kruge wrote: View Post

the Botany Bay was launched in 1996, and since Nero alters the timeline in the 23rd century, then presumably yes, its still drifting in space....


The general rule of thumb seems to be that which took place before Nero's intervention is the same, everything after is either altered or will no longer take place

I'll show myself out....
What is the likelihood that they are going to show the Botany Bay on the big screen looking exactly like it did in "Space Seed"? Or that Khan's backstory will be tied to 1990's Eugenics Wars?

The temptation, and probable need, to contemporize those details is going to mess with a single point of diverence theory.
Dick Whitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 04:40 PM   #1506
Spinstorm
Ensign
 
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

lol if Khan ever turned up in a sequel - I would not want him to be from 1996!

Even in Star Trek II that sounds beyond stupid.

I like Star Trek because its realistic and a possibilty of what the future may be like and setting anything in OUR past which is blatently not true destroys that.

Forget cannon - I don't care - I wan't something realistic - which is another good reason why Shatner would have made this film look stupid if he was in it...

No thank you!
Spinstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 07:38 PM   #1507
SiddFinch1
Commander
 
SiddFinch1's Avatar
 
Location: State of Mind
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Dac wrote: View Post
SiddFinch1 wrote: View Post
Is Vulcan blown to bits or is it destroyed in a way in which the planet could have been sucked into an alternate universe timeline as Nero and Spock were?

Is it specified what year the main events take place/how old Kirk is? From what i read Spock prime was confused that Kirk was not Captain yet- does that mean the movie is in 2266?
Vulcan is blown to smithereens. Unless someone has mega industrial strength super glue and alot of spare time (not to mention knowing where and when it got sucked to) it aient coming back save for more time travel.

The opening scene takes place in 2233 - This is where Kirk is born. When we see him as an adult he is 25, making it 2258, and he then spends 3 years at the Academy before boarding the Enterprise, meaning the film should take place around 2260 (Give or take a few months).
If the main part of the movie is 2260, why would Spock-prime be confused that Kirk is not the Capt of the E yet? I thought Kirk Prime didnt take over until around 2265 or 2266- so now Nu-Kirk takes over 5 years earlier than Kirk-prime did?
__________________
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans: John Lennon
SiddFinch1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 08:48 PM   #1508
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

^ Actually we have no idea when Kirk first took command of the Enterprise in the original timeline.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:19 PM   #1509
SiddFinch1
Commander
 
SiddFinch1's Avatar
 
Location: State of Mind
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Babaganoosh wrote: View Post
^ Actually we have no idea when Kirk first took command of the Enterprise in the original timeline.
I thought that once they used the 2283 date on the romulan ale in ST2 that it more or less set his first 5 year mission as 2265-69 as Khan was marooned 15 years earlier
__________________
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans: John Lennon
SiddFinch1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:33 PM   #1510
Kruge
Lieutenant Commander
 
Kruge's Avatar
 
Location: Furiously shuttling between the Prime and Alternate Universes...
Send a message via Yahoo to Kruge
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

SiddFinch1 wrote: View Post
Babaganoosh wrote: View Post
^ Actually we have no idea when Kirk first took command of the Enterprise in the original timeline.
I thought that once they used the 2283 date on the romulan ale in ST2 that it more or less set his first 5 year mission as 2265-69 as Khan was marooned 15 years earlier
Okay sorry to get off the topic of the new Trek and spoilers, but this comment just reminded me of a point of contention I have with the whole "official" Star Trek Chronology...

There were never any dates given in TOS..Roddenberry supposedly left this up in the air at first, stating that the show could be anywhere from 300 to 800 years in the future...in fact, when Kirk and Co. travel back to the 1960s, and Kirk is threatened with being locked up for "200 years", he muses "Yeah, that's about right", which would place the show in the 2160s...

That aside, the show's chronology was eventually retconned to have occured from 2266 onwards, TNG taking place in the 24th century, and so forth...now here's my beef:

People often say that The Motion Picture must've taken place in the early 2270s, because of Deckers comment that Kirk hadn't logged a single star hour(whatever that is) in such and such number of years..therefore, if the Enterprise's 5 year mission began in 2266 and ended in 2271, TMP must take place in the early 2270s, say 2271 or 72 or 73....

My problem is that this lacks imagination...if Trek debuted in 1966 and took place in 2266, then why can't TMP take place in 2279, and the missing years in between are simply that...missing! They weren't depicted on screen, but Kirk had further adventures, got promoted to Admiral, got bored pushing papers, and then V'Ger comes along in '79...

To me at least, it would make more sense, because it would explain why the uniforms look so different, why the characters have obviously aged more than a few years, etc, etc.

That's my two cents...I know what Okuda's Chronology says, but I strongly disagree...
__________________
If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Kruge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:39 PM   #1511
KirkusOveractus
Captain
 
KirkusOveractus's Avatar
 
Location: Ambler, PA
Send a message via AIM to KirkusOveractus
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

^ I do understand what you've written, but I think they covered the age issue with the implication of the timeframe of TWOK. TMP was supposed to be 2 1/2 years after TOS (or thereabouts), and TWOK was supposed to be 10 years after that, which brings everything up to the right timeframe.

However, TWOK never mentions on screen the time between, so we'll never really know.

Wasn't the final year of the Enterprise's five-year mission mentioned in an episode of ENT?
KirkusOveractus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:42 PM   #1512
Kruge
Lieutenant Commander
 
Kruge's Avatar
 
Location: Furiously shuttling between the Prime and Alternate Universes...
Send a message via Yahoo to Kruge
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Donald Draper wrote: View Post
Kruge wrote: View Post

the Botany Bay was launched in 1996, and since Nero alters the timeline in the 23rd century, then presumably yes, its still drifting in space....


The general rule of thumb seems to be that which took place before Nero's intervention is the same, everything after is either altered or will no longer take place

I'll show myself out....
What is the likelihood that they are going to show the Botany Bay on the big screen looking exactly like it did in "Space Seed"? Or that Khan's backstory will be tied to 1990's Eugenics Wars?

The temptation, and probable need, to contemporize those details is going to mess with a single point of diverence theory.
WOw this is like the only time I've actually learned something USEFUL from Voyager!! Imagine that!

Remember the episode (or maybe you don't because you never watched Voyager, you lucky person you!) when Voyager's crew travels back to 1996, meets Sarah Silverman, and we see no evidence of the Eugenics Wars having taken place?

Apparently, according to the book I have here by Greg Cox, called Star Trek: The Eugenics Wars, that's because the Eugenics Wars were more of a behind-the-scenes, secret agent, shadow government type conflict that the public was largely unaware of...various real-life events are tied in to Khan's meddling in world affairs, with the general population largely oblivious to the truth behind the conspiracy!

And that's how they managed to turn one of Roddenberry's boners (ha ha I said it) into something WAAAAY more convoluted but nevertheless somewhat more believable...I think....

That all being said, I truly hope that they don't revist Khan and his supermen...it was boring in Space Seed, it worked surpisingly well in TWOK, and it was really stupid on Enterprise...Call me hypocritical, but while it was necessary to recruit younger actors to play the leads, it would be definitley a stretch to re-cast Khan...

Plus, if Spock Prime is still puttering around the nuTrek universe at the conclusion of Star Trek, then he could easily tell young Spock and Kirk the best way to defeat Khan....DONT FREAKING WAKE HIM UP IF YOU FIND HIM!!!
__________________
If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Kruge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:46 PM   #1513
Kruge
Lieutenant Commander
 
Kruge's Avatar
 
Location: Furiously shuttling between the Prime and Alternate Universes...
Send a message via Yahoo to Kruge
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

KirkusOveractus wrote: View Post
^ I do understand what you've written, but I think they covered the age issue with the implication of the timeframe of TWOK. TMP was supposed to be 2 1/2 years after TOS (or thereabouts), and TWOK was supposed to be 10 years after that, which brings everything up to the right timeframe.

However, TWOK never mentions on screen the time between, so we'll never really know.

Wasn't the final year of the Enterprise's five-year mission mentioned in an episode of ENT?
Yes it was....

You know, the funny thing is that before TNG and the subsequent Trek movies, there never was an established chronology for Trek...fans speculated that the series occured in the very early 23rd century, and their estimates were proven right when, in the opening scene of TWOK, we are told for the first time what century Trek takes place in....I am not 100 percent sure about this, but I remember reading that firm dates did not come about until much later...in fact, it may have been with TNG explicity stating the year as 2364 in one episode that people started working backwards and figuring out when the shows and movies took place


It doesnt really matter, it's just one of those thigns that bothers me...personally, I doubt we'll be even close to that advanced by the 23rd century...at the present pace, we'll probably barely have sent manned missions to the farthest reaches of the Solar System, and I think based on what I've read that any kind of feasible means of traveling interstellar distances is many centuries away...not impossible, just improbable...
__________________
If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Kruge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 09:54 PM   #1514
Kruge
Lieutenant Commander
 
Kruge's Avatar
 
Location: Furiously shuttling between the Prime and Alternate Universes...
Send a message via Yahoo to Kruge
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

And btw, not trying to be a Bob Bummer here, I love the future that Trek envisions (except for the whole idea of this vast, moneyless federation nannystate controlling everything, I prefer individual liberty thank you), I just think that humans have a tendency to wait until the last minute to come up with things like interstellar travel...probably not until the earth is rendered uninhabitable, THEN suddenly the funding for traveling to another planet will make itself available...but space travel for simple exploration?? Not in my life time...
__________________
If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Kruge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1 2009, 10:52 PM   #1515
Peacemaker
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Time Vortex
Re: World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Donald Draper wrote: View Post
Kruge wrote: View Post

the Botany Bay was launched in 1996, and since Nero alters the timeline in the 23rd century, then presumably yes, its still drifting in space....


The general rule of thumb seems to be that which took place before Nero's intervention is the same, everything after is either altered or will no longer take place

I'll show myself out....
What is the likelihood that they are going to show the Botany Bay on the big screen looking exactly like it did in "Space Seed"? Or that Khan's backstory will be tied to 1990's Eugenics Wars?

The temptation, and probable need, to contemporize those details is going to mess with a single point of diverence theory.
That would have to mean that this new universe can't be too different than the other...for if that's so, then Enterprise happened, and if Enterprise happened, then the Borg in FC happened too, which means that the 24th century events that led to the events in FC happened, and so on.
Peacemaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
st xi advance screenings

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.