RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,219
Posts: 5,405,183
Members: 24,762
Currently online: 498
Newest member: jeb1138

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 31 2009, 09:23 PM   #31
JustKate
Rear Admiral
 
JustKate's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana, USA
Re: Keeping Pets in Starfleet...

Praetor wrote: View Post
Well, then you have my approval at least.

I just realized I neglected to respond to this:
JustKate wrote: View Post
No pets allowed on board ship, of course, but then again, no families, either.

On base all that's allowed...maybe a starship is sort of half ship, have base?
"Have Base, Will Travel"?



*pats self on back*

I know what you mean, though. I really strongly suspect the degree to which Starfleet adheres to the more traditional 'military' model varies according to the political ebbs and flows of the particular era, too. TOS and the ovies seemed very military, so no families/pets on Starfleet ships in the mid to late 23rd. TNG was more family friendly so families and pets in that era. Then DS9 gave us the Dominion War - I imagine families were banned from most ships for a while, even if they were still allowed on the 'base' DS9. And of course as mentioned earlier, VGR was a special case.
"ovies"? *pokes Praetor in a friendly but joking manner and pats self on back*

Yeah, I do think it sort of ebbed and flowed, depending on the situation at the time during which the show was set and also the specific mission. For that matter, it varies at military bases on foreign soil during our own time, too.

So why Archer was allowed to bring that dog is one of those little mysteries that will never truly be solved. I mean, surely nobody thought his a routine mission?
JustKate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 31 2009, 10:25 PM   #32
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Keeping Pets in Starfleet...

JustKate wrote: View Post
Praetor wrote: View Post
Well, then you have my approval at least.

I just realized I neglected to respond to this:
JustKate wrote: View Post
No pets allowed on board ship, of course, but then again, no families, either.

On base all that's allowed...maybe a starship is sort of half ship, have base?
"Have Base, Will Travel"?



*pats self on back*

I know what you mean, though. I really strongly suspect the degree to which Starfleet adheres to the more traditional 'military' model varies according to the political ebbs and flows of the particular era, too. TOS and the ovies seemed very military, so no families/pets on Starfleet ships in the mid to late 23rd. TNG was more family friendly so families and pets in that era. Then DS9 gave us the Dominion War - I imagine families were banned from most ships for a while, even if they were still allowed on the 'base' DS9. And of course as mentioned earlier, VGR was a special case.
"ovies"? *pokes Praetor in a friendly but joking manner and pats self on back*
Gah, epic fail on my part. But you must admit that was hilarious. Especially since GR used to write for the western 'Have Gun, Will Travel.'

At least I laughed.

Yeah, I do think it sort of ebbed and flowed, depending on the situation at the time during which the show was set and also the specific mission. For that matter, it varies at military bases on foreign soil during our own time, too.
I didn't know the latter part.

So why Archer was allowed to bring that dog is one of those little mysteries that will never truly be solved. I mean, surely nobody thought his a routine mission?


Bad writing?

*hides*
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
pets

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.