RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,560
Posts: 5,423,129
Members: 24,809
Currently online: 495
Newest member: Dobian

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Coto Drama Sold To Fox
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Braga Inks Deal
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Remastered Original Series Re-release
By: T'Bonz on Sep 11

UK Trek Ships Calendar Debuts
By: T'Bonz on Sep 10


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Battlestar Galactica & Caprica

Battlestar Galactica & Caprica This forum was created by man. It rebelled. It evolved. And it has a plan.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old March 20 2009, 07:04 PM   #46
MPH
Rear Admiral
 
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

It jumps 150,000 years in the future for a perfectly silly coda (look for Moore in a silent cameo) that I, for one, shall now repress from my memory."

If this is true then I saw that coming as the cycle never ends.
MPH is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:14 PM   #47
chrisspringob
Commodore
 
Location: North Ryde, NSW
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

NY Posts's TV critic gives it four stars:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03202009...ust_160365.htm

I took the pledge, but here's what I can tell you: the finale explains many of the unexplainables, ties up loose ends and will thrill you with a helluva shocker of an ending. (Or beginning.)

If you're not a die-hard fan, you may have trouble following the complicated storyline, but you will be left breathless nonetheless. The special effects, the acting, the sets, the action, the questions asked and answered will prove to be among Sci Fi's (soon-to-be unfortunately renamed " Syfy") greatest moments.
chrisspringob is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:18 PM   #48
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

Cute.

BTW, the reviewer's remark about people "raising their hands to pledge...like a 12-step meeting" is bullshit passing for observant wit. They don't do that at those meetings; nothing like it.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:32 PM   #49
Ryan Thomas Riddle
Rear Admiral
 
Ryan Thomas Riddle's Avatar
 
Location: The Bay Area
View Ryan Thomas Riddle's Twitter Profile
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

Agent Richard07 wrote: View Post
Six Feet Under has the best finale I've ever seen.
Fo'sho. That and Babylon 5's "Sleeping in Light" because I had the feeling that I was saying good-bye to these characters and their lives. Of course, SiL, imnsho, is better viewed at the end of the fourth season than at the end of the fifth.

If the nuBSG finale gives me that feeling of saying good-bye, then I'll consider it a success. And I have no doubt that I am saying good-bye because of the last few episodes.
__________________
A mild-mannered reporter
Ryan Thomas Riddle is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
daybreak

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.