|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Comrade
Location: Ireland
|
Why so little Uhura in ST3?
One, is that it's a much better film than I remember, some great character moments ("how can you be deaf with ears that big?"; "don't call me 'Tiny;"; "but you don't have eight, so I'll do it for ye in two", significant things happen (David dies, Ent gets scuttled) and I can't help feeling it may have been a lot better if it wasn't for the hokey Genesis studio set. It also has the single best line in all of trek "That green-blooded son of a bitch ..." you all know the rest ... Anyways, one thing that's puzzled me is that Uhura is completely absent after the transporter scene with "Mr Adventure" until the final scene on Vulcan. I'm amazed I never noticed before. Can anyone shed any light on this? Is there some backstage story concerning Nichelle Nichols? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
It's a good dark film, albeit with a very simple story, although sometimes they work the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
Location: In ur Starbug
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
My favorite Trek film, BTW...truest to everything Trek ever meant to me growing up. "The needs of the ONE sometimes outweigh the needs of the many." Only Jim Kirk. <sniffle> |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Black Mesa Research Facility
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
Don't forget the best part, though - 'I (kick) have HAD (kick) enough of YOU! (KICK)' |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
Jeez! Joe, not easily shocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Germany - with UHC since the early 1900s
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
Not sure what the actual reason for her lack of usage was, but I can easily imagine the execs considering that not as exciting so they wanted it left out. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
__________________
For the internet is hollow and I have touched my keyboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
__________________
"I'm a man, but I can change, if I have to.....I guess." "If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." "Not all treasure is sliver and gold, mate." |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion) The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Cuddly Mod of Doom
Location: Peach Wookiee
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
__________________
Peach's Websites http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1373040/ http://peachwookiee.deviantart.com/ http://peachwookieesparty.blogspot.com/ Check them out! |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
That'd make me happy, too!
__________________
Live in the Connecticut/SW Massachusetts area? Need a tutor for you or your kids? PM me! Let's see what's out there... |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Admiral
Location: In ur Starbug
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Why so little Uhura in ST3?
Sulu had the 'tiny' scene Chekov the destruct scene and they are just background button pushers for the rest of the movie I am a crazy line counter I counted all the lines for the main regular characters in TSFS up till the stealing of the Enterprise, recently. Uhura has about 30 lines Sulu about 25 Chekov about 20 and Kirk nearly 300 lines and he's just getting warmed up, the others by that point had had their spotlight time.Anybody who truly thinks that Nimoy changed balance of focus for the minor characters is just unaware. In trek 3 & 4 he gave them each a little bit to do in one scene and they thought it was some kind of big deal. TOS was the big 3, period. Nimoy was just able to massage the egos of the other actors to keep them happy, not expand their roles. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| star trek iii, uhura |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















and he's just getting warmed up, the others by that point had had their spotlight time.




