RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,568
Posts: 5,402,575
Members: 24,865
Currently online: 669
Newest member: shyrim

TrekToday headlines

October-November 2014 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Cho Selfie TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

TPTB To Shatner: Shhh!
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Mystery Mini Vinyl Figure Display Box
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

The Red Shirt Diaries Episode Five
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

Shatner In Trek 3? Well Maybe
By: T'Bonz on Sep 28

Retro Review: Shadows and Symbols
By: Michelle on Sep 27

Meyer: Revitalizing Star Trek
By: T'Bonz on Sep 26

Trek Costumes To Be Auctioned
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25

Hulu Snaps up Abrams-Produced Drama
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 1 2008, 12:21 PM   #31
I Am Groot
I Am Groot
 
I Am Groot's Avatar
 
Location: I Am Groot
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

If you're into the story of the film the run-time generally isn't an issue. I've seen three hour movies that flew by in no time at all because I was enthralled with the plot, and 90 minute movies that dragged on for an eternity because they sucked.

This doesn't give me any cause to worry about the quality of the film.
__________________
We are Groot and Locutus of Bored.
I Am Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2 2008, 07:23 AM   #32
Barbados Slim
Rear Admiral
 
Barbados Slim's Avatar
 
Location: The L.A.
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

No big deal because it's the same writers and Marc Forster who's a good director. The story will be good.

Plus remember, CR set up most of the plot elements for this, since this is the first true sequel to a Bond movie. I think the 106 will be lean and fulfilling. Plus that car going off the cliff looks crazy awesome. And Olga looks crazy hot. And Bond looks crazy pissed.
Barbados Slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2 2008, 02:31 PM   #33
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: feeling a chill...
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

nx1701g wrote: View Post
I am not Spock wrote: View Post
I thought OHMSS was the longest Bond movie to date?
Casino beat OHMSS by 4 minutes.

OHMSS: 140 min
Casino Royale: 144 min
Does that include the credits? Because I think the credits to CR went on a lot longer than OHMSS.

Whilst I was of the opinion that, for all its good stuff, Casino Royale was too long (and badly paced with it) a 106 minute film seems a tad short for Bond, especially if rumours about a 20 minute pretitle sequence are true!
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Guardians of the Galaxy review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2 2008, 04:55 PM   #34
blablover5
Admiral
 
blablover5's Avatar
 
Location: Blizzard land
View blablover5's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to blablover5
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

Hermiod wrote: View Post
bridezilla wrote: View Post
It's funny but I really like it up until they get to the casino then it just all grinds to a halt.
(Heh, nice change of username )
If you're not careful and bring me a sacrafice of bouquets and wedding cake I'll smash you with my huge feet and tail.

I'm still working on breathing fire though.
__________________
My life--in 500 words or less
"I'm back, baby."
Organs shaped like soap -- wait, reverse that.
blablover5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2 2008, 05:43 PM   #35
Hermiod
Admiral
 
Hermiod's Avatar
 
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

^Huge feet ?

You don't know what huge feet look like! Trust me!
Hermiod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 2 2008, 05:51 PM   #36
CaptJimboJones
Vice Admiral
 
CaptJimboJones's Avatar
 
Location: Hotlanta
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

Ian Fleming's original Bond novels were generally quite short - Casino Royale was 192 pages, for example. They were tight, taut thrillers that focused primarily on plot, and it worked pretty well.

There's nothing wrong with a short movie if the story is told well, in fact, it would be in keeping with Fleming's original style.
__________________
"Do not fear mistakes. There are none." - Miles Davis
CaptJimboJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 5 2008, 12:47 AM   #37
TedShatner10
Commodore
 
TedShatner10's Avatar
 
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

I prefered Tomorrow Never Dies to GoldenEye because there was less random filler (and GoldenEye had worse pacing issues than Casino Royale, especially in Southern France and Russia).
TedShatner10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2008, 06:38 AM   #38
Agent Richard07
Admiral
 
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

Hermiod wrote: View Post
To be honest, there's at least twenty minutes I'd cut out of Casino Royale. Most of which involve Bond sitting around recouperating. I don't think anyone goes to see a Bond movie to watch Bond lying in a bed or sitting in a wheelchair doing nothing for twenty minutes.
I enjoyed those parts. It was nice to see that side of Bond.
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2008, 11:28 AM   #39
I am not Spock
Commodore
 
Location: Australia
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

Casino Royale didn't feel as long as that to me. Maybe I was just into the story, and din't notice the long length.
__________________
It's a FAAAAKKKEEE!
Senator Vreenak- In the Pale Moonlight
I am not Spock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2008, 12:27 PM   #40
Jax
Admiral
 
Jax's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

QoS does not need to set the story as CR did so am not surprised that this is shorter though I expect the 3rd film which is the final part of this loose trilogy like story will be somewhere in between and then I wonder if Craig will extend his contract, I think not.
__________________
If Fidelity to freedom and democracy is the code of our civic religion then surely the code of our humanity is faithful service to that unwritten commandment that says we shall give our children better than we ourselves received
Jax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2008, 01:38 PM   #41
Hermiod
Admiral
 
Hermiod's Avatar
 
Re: "Quickness" of Solace

BOO7! wrote: View Post
Hermiod wrote: View Post
To be honest, there's at least twenty minutes I'd cut out of Casino Royale. Most of which involve Bond sitting around recouperating. I don't think anyone goes to see a Bond movie to watch Bond lying in a bed or sitting in a wheelchair doing nothing for twenty minutes.
I enjoyed those parts. It was nice to see that side of Bond.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service did a considerably better job of Bond in Love without such scenes.
Hermiod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
007, bond, daniel craig, quantum of solace

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.