RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,571
Posts: 5,423,371
Members: 24,810
Currently online: 471
Newest member: toaster

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Coto Drama Sold To Fox
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Braga Inks Deal
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Remastered Original Series Re-release
By: T'Bonz on Sep 11

UK Trek Ships Calendar Debuts
By: T'Bonz on Sep 10


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Site Forums > TrekToday News Items

TrekToday News Items Discussion of TrekToday news items

 
 
Thread Tools
Old September 20 2008, 06:06 AM   #1
TrekToday
Rear Admiral
 
'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

When it came to Star Trek XI, being mindful of canon and avoiding making the film campy was a priority for J.J. Abrams.

As reported by BBC Radio 1, in an interview with host Chris Moyles, Abrams discussed Star Trek canon and why certain things are in the film or not in the film. "There are no seatbelts [on the Enterprise]," he said. "You have to honor the canon of 'Star Trek.' Where do you draw the line? There are certain things that you want to be consistent about."

Star Trek XI's Enterprise does have a toilet, according to Abrams, or more precisely, a shuttlecraft does and part of a scene refers to a character being in the bathroom. "There is a toilet in one of the shuttles, that the production designer put in," said Abrams. "It was in the script that one of the characters is actually in the restroom because he was afraid of flying. He comes out of the restroom, but you don't see it." When BBC Radio 1 host Moyles said, "He's in the wrong job," Abrams replied, "That's the point of the scene."

While there are known elements of the Star Trek world, other things are unknown and had to be created for the movie. "It is very funny because when you get into what is known, they had blueprints that they sold, but a lot of it is just hypothesis, like made up," explained Abrams. "The show itself made mistakes. The idea that there is a canon of Trek and what is honest-to-goodness Trek and what you can't change. The show itself changed its own history and revised things a lot. So clearly the approach was we want to make this thing feel real because it is so, it's so insane, the idea of these massive starships. And so the goal of doing this movie, despite it being called 'Star Trek,' despite pointy ears and the history of it and all the established fans and hundreds of hours and almost a dozen movies and all that kind of stuff, is that we actually feel like this is a new thing and this is actually legitimate."

Making a legitimate film means avoiding descending into "camp." "[Making 'Star Trek' seem real] is probably the biggest challenge, because it is by default so close to being campy," said Abrams. "Like you see 'Galaxy Quest,' which is such a great movie, and it is so, it's like a real, slightly hyper, real when you are actually on the set doing 'Star Trek,' there are these moments that are like 'Oh dear God, how do I not make this bad?' You see how you could so easily go the wrong direction and suddenly you are mocking your own world."

"There were moments where I thought 'the biggest challenge of this moment is to make it not suck," said Abrams. "To make it not be the version that in Ben Stiller's hands or someone, which would be hysterically funny, and yet that is not the result you want for this moment."

In answers to questions from host Moyles, Abrams said that, "We're a couple of weeks away from 'locking' the film," that there would be a "red shirt death,", Kirk wears a gold shirt at some point in the movie and that "Shatner is not in it."

To see the video, head to the link located here.

TrekToday is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 06:12 AM   #2
number6
Vice Admiral
 
Location: number6 has left the village through some inexpicable hole in the ground to head the corporation.
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

OMG!! Shatner's totally going to be in it!!
number6 is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 06:23 AM   #3
MattJC
Fleet Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

Yeah, like the rest of the 40+ years of Trek wasn't legitimate right, JJ?
MattJC is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 06:44 AM   #4
Dale
Vice Admiral
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Location: Mt. Baldy, CA
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

MattJC wrote: View Post
Yeah, like the rest of the 40+ years of Trek wasn't legitimate right, JJ?
What the man is saying is that he has strived to make his film a legitimate part of the existing Star Trek history and legacy... and so it shall be, your meaningless and completely unfounded protestations notwithstanding.
__________________
For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. - 2 Timothy 4:3
Dale is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 02:02 PM   #5
Turbo
Vice Admiral
 
Turbo's Avatar
 
Location: Atlanta
View Turbo's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Turbo
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

A redshirt dies? FINE! I'll see the damn movie on opening night. CURSE YOU, JJ!
__________________
Allons-y!
Turbo is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 04:13 PM   #6
Procutus
Admiral
 
Procutus's Avatar
 
Location: Caught in a Prism...
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

TrekToday wrote: View Post

"Like you see 'Galaxy Quest,' which is such a great movie, and it is so, it's like a real, slightly hyper, real when you are actually on the set doing 'Star Trek,' there are these moments that are like 'Oh dear God, how do I not make this bad?'



I see J.J. is off his meds again, the way he's rambling. Just once, in one interview, I wish he'd take just one small scene and explain it in clear, concise English, just how they went about making it seem real, or how that particular scene honors canon.

I am totally psyched for this film, but if Abrams can't give an interview in which he just doesn't babble non-sensical stuff, I wish they'd keep quiet until they're ready to release something substantial that would show us something.

BTW, I'm tickled to learn that a redshirt dies!


__________________
Proud user of Windows XP since 2006.
Procutus is offline  
Old September 20 2008, 08:02 PM   #7
T'Cal
Commodore
 
T'Cal's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

What's a "redshirt"???
>
>
>
>
>
>
Just kidding. Kill them all!!!
__________________
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." -- Judge Aaron Satie
T'Cal is offline  
Old September 21 2008, 04:13 AM   #8
Emh
Doctor of TARDIS
 
Emh's Avatar
 
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Send a message via ICQ to Emh Send a message via AIM to Emh Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Emh Send a message via Yahoo to Emh
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

You just know people are going to bitch about that toilet scene.
__________________
"Eccleston was a tiger and Tennant was, well, Tigger. Smith [is] an uncoordinated housecat who pretends that he meant to do that after falling off a piece of furniture." - Lynne M. Thomas

"I'm in Hell and it's full of Avons!" - Vila
Emh is offline  
Old September 21 2008, 06:44 PM   #9
Procutus
Admiral
 
Procutus's Avatar
 
Location: Caught in a Prism...
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

Emh wrote: View Post
You just know people are going to bitch about that toilet scene.


Depends on what the toilet looks like.


__________________
Proud user of Windows XP since 2006.
Procutus is offline  
Old September 21 2008, 09:28 PM   #10
Basil
Fleet Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

He sounds like he cribbed a lot from discussion boards like these to rattle off that Star Trek "revised" it's own history, etc.
Basil is offline  
Old September 21 2008, 09:39 PM   #11
MattJC
Fleet Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

Yeah, he's using the idea of a few inconsistincies in TOS to try to make this reboot more acceptable to those of us who don't want a reboot.
MattJC is offline  
Old September 22 2008, 02:26 AM   #12
number6
Vice Admiral
 
Location: number6 has left the village through some inexpicable hole in the ground to head the corporation.
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

Um.. Yeah, Matt.
That's exactly what he's trying to do.
number6 is offline  
Old September 22 2008, 02:52 AM   #13
MattJC
Fleet Captain
 
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

It's a lame excuse to do a reboot.
MattJC is offline  
Old September 22 2008, 03:19 AM   #14
number6
Vice Admiral
 
Location: number6 has left the village through some inexpicable hole in the ground to head the corporation.
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

MattJC wrote: View Post
It's a lame excuse to do a reboot.
It's really lame to continually whine and complain about a film you have no intention of seeing
number6 is offline  
Old September 22 2008, 07:49 AM   #15
Gep Malakai
Vice Admiral
 
Gep Malakai's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to Gep Malakai Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Gep Malakai
Re: 'Star Trek XI' Mindful Of Canon

number6 wrote: View Post
It's really lame to continually whine and complain about a film you have no intention of seeing
Can I get an "amen!"?
__________________
"From the darkness you must fall, failed and weak, to darkness all."
-Kataris
Gep Malakai is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.