|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
Let's hope this movie rocks.
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale. |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
Taken from the special edition dvd release. Its a good watch. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSNO7LL_L3Y
__________________
"Course your not,your not scared of anything. Box falls out the sky, man falls out of box, man eats fish custard. Look at you, just sittin' there,you know what i think? Must be helluva scary crack in your wall" - The Doctor
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Austin, Texas
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: New Vulcan
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
The BATMAN TV show wasn't a serious story. It was meant to be an ongoing joke. Every episode was done tongue in cheek. The current movies are done in the more serious tone of the comicbooks (in particular with how the books have been in recent years). Still, even with Batman, I think a virtual TANK as the Batmobile is going too far. The car's usually depicted in the comics as a useable automobile, albeit often with "hidden extras". But I digress... Star Trek, while "meant to sell toothpaste", has always been taken as serious by its fans. In the ENTERPRISE two-parter "In a Mirror, Darkly", modern TREK characters were seen on sets built to duplicate the ones from the original STAR TREK. It worked PERFECTLY. To compare Shatner's Kirk's Enterprise with the TV Batmobile and so claim it needs to be updated to look "acceptable" just isn't valid. The original Enterprise looked fine, and could be used in a current production. Really... How many of you would have turned up your nose if the original designs had been kept in JJ's film? You'd have gone to see the movie. You KNOW you would. You'd probably even be a little on the "giddy" side...which you usually look down on us "traditionalists" for being. We'd ALL have loved it if the original STAR TREK had been restored, with only new actors playing the roles. Why would the way the Enterprise looks, inside or out, or props like communicators, affect your enjoyment of the story? You say that to us "don't change anything!" people, so it should be all right for one of us to say it to you guys who insist "change is good". Would it have been so bad to recreate ALL the sets as they were, all the props, etc, and just have changed the characters' faces? I seriously doubt even people who aren't Trek fans would have stayed away just because the original look was kept. After all, you guys keep saying "It's the story telling that's important". The look didn't HAVE TO be changed. The fact that some of it has (to an unknown degree, at this point, tho the uniform spoilers give some hope), well...okay. It's done. I'm still going to the film, and any sequels. But to say it HAD to be changed, and to compare the original Enterprise to the TV Batmobile as proof that change was NEEDED? Uh-uh. No way. Shatner's Kirk's Enterprise would still have flown today, and if the ship IS going to look fairly close to the original, this suggests that really no changes were desperately needed. The original was NOT comparable to the TV Batmobile. Whole 'nother situation.
__________________
Trek: Onscreen is canon, books are interesting. Movies change canon, scissors wrap paper...or...something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
__________________
"The world is my country, science is my religion." - Christiaan Huygens https://www.facebook.com/bryceburchett |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Indiana
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
I agree with you, I don't really like "The Tumbler" myself, it isn't really a batmobile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
And, Therin is right, as with most movie props, there's no one Batmobile from any of the movies. There are usually several, some designed as "hero" vehicles with lots of detail, and others mere shells designed for specific kinds of shots.
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Lieutenant
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
It wasn't a attractive ship to begin with with it looking very awkward, hell there were early publicity shots shown upside down as people thought the ship looked daft the other way up. The BoP is a much better design which has stood up very well, the old enterprise looks like it would crack aprt at its spindly anorexic seams if it ever tried anything stressing like moving. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Austin, Texas
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
The "Ep1" Yoda LOOKED different, but was created using the same technology. The "Ep2/3" Yoda looked the same as the original one, but was created using new techniques. Both were puppeteered and voiced by the same guy... but in one case it was a physical "filming model" puppet and in the other it was a composite approach, involving mo-cap of a physical "scanner puppet," combined with the more common "full CGI animation" techniques... As a result, the Ep2/3 Yoda looked like we expected him to look, moved like we expected him to move, but was a whole lot MORE convincing than the original filming puppet... or the Ep1 puppet. One of the big problems with "change" is that change doesn't always equal progress. Sometimes the most progressive approach is to realize you're on the wrong road and to turn around and go back the soonest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Austin, Texas
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
![]() ![]() Well, how about THIS? It's not a "CHANGE"... it's far more closely related to the original comic-book (ie, "source material") costume than EITHER of the above.
Last edited by Cary L. Brown; August 18 2008 at 02:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
__________________
Bashir: »Out of all the stories you told me, which ones were true and which ones weren't?« Garak: »My dear doctor, they're all true.« Bashir: »Even the lies?« Garak: »Especially the lies.« |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
i think batman's costume in the new movie was way too over thought as well. it's not proof of anything. I also think batman in comics drawn on paper looks cooler than any actual guy in a costume so what does it matter anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: Visual Proof a Resdesign is a good thing
Like when they redesigned the ship for the Next generation movies and it became this smooth sports car like version of the enterprise, it just wasn't as star trek-like. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| batman, batmobile, metaphorical nipples |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.























