RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,238
Posts: 5,438,676
Members: 24,958
Currently online: 554
Newest member: greatmovies

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 25 2014, 07:36 PM   #31
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: Question About the Ship's Phasers

Maurice wrote: View Post
AtoZ wrote: View Post
And speaking of ship phaser fire and the typical use of two beams....why were the phasers mere ball-like bursts for Balance of Terror (I am a new convert to this episode) as opposed to the generally used dual streams of ray?
drt wrote: View Post
I'd chalk it up to being early in the production before how they were supposed to work was figured out.
C.E. Evans wrote: View Post
The actual script called for the phasers to be set to "proximity blasts," basically turning them into depth charges against a Romulan ship the Enterprise couldn't see.
The script actually describes the weapons effect thusly:
91 EXT. SPACE - COMET TAIL

The Enterprise suddenly zooms into sight through the
comet's semi-transparent tail -- cutting loose with
energy "blips" from its phaser weapons.
So it was planned to be like this, not a VFX error.
The aforementioned proximity blasts. A way of either quickly fishing out an enemy out of hiding or rapidly bombing an entire area where an enemy might be hiding.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2014, 07:58 PM   #32
cgervasi
Lieutenant
 
Location: Madison, WI
View cgervasi's Twitter Profile
Re: Question About the Ship's Phasers

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Because it looks cool. I doubt there is any other reason.
I agree. Also in The Doomsday Machine, when Kirk and Scotty got the trashed ship fixed up a little, it fired one beam. It was a great visual illustrating the fact that the other ship was barely operational.
cgervasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 7 2014, 09:05 PM   #33
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: Question About the Ship's Phasers

drt wrote: View Post
I'd chalk it up to being early in the production before how they were supposed to work was figured out.

Only "Corbomite" preceeded it as an episode showing the main phasers being fired, and the phaser effects for each episode were done by different post-production companies.
Explaining the look of the phasers on Arena

I always thought the phasers and photon torpedoes were related somehow, before the deal with anti-matter came about
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.