So let's say two girls are arguing over a guy, and things come to a head and they say he has to choose one or the other. Would it be wrong for the guy to ask: "Why can't you two share?" Edit: I actually do mean this as a serious question.
It depends how much the guy values having his genitals continue being attached to his body. Edit: I actually do mean this as a serious answer!
Was he two-timing them? By that I mean he was dating them at the same time, but without them knowing about each other. If so, that makes him a sleaze. If they're just fighting over who actually gets to date him, well, why not just arrange to share him? I mean, if he's really that awesome, surely they can work something out so they both get time with him.
I think in such a situation would be a good argument for carrying around smoke bombs in order to facilitate easy, quick and hidden get aways.
Before you ask this question, imagine for a moment if the gender ratio was reversed. Would you like to share your best girl with your best bud. Think that things would work out amicably all the round? The S H A T I N A T O R
I'm reminded of Kirk's answer... "You can ask" This is the type of question that has no right answer to.
Yes, it would be wrong, as he would be assuming that neither woman had the dignity or self-respect to not settle for a man who wouldn't "choose" them unless it involved him being able to have sex and/or a relationship with someone else at the same time. And I'm assuming these aren't "girls" but grown women, because otherwise the "guy" in question would be a pedophile.
Sure... I think I know what Kirk's answer to it would be, though. Scratch that; Kirk would be asking it!
More context needed? OK. the situation took place in Pittsburgh on a tuesday afternoon in April, it was raining. The man in question was Filipino with dyed blonde hair and a goatee. One of the girls was raised at an orphanage, the other was wearing a bowler hat and had a limp.