2nd Ship in the Into Darkness Trailer

Discussion in 'Fan Art' started by YARN, Dec 7, 2012.

  1. YARN

    YARN Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    The 2nd ship in the trailer (going into the water) does not look like the nu-Trek Enterprise.

    Any guesses as to what ship that one is?
     
  2. Unicron

    Unicron Boss Monster Mod Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Crown of the Moon
    I'm not sure. To me, in the tiny sliver visible in the trailer, it looked a lot like the Enterprise. But I could easily be wrong on that.
     
  3. Ensign Ro-

    Ensign Ro- Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Location:
    Maine, USA
    TrekNovie. com did a shot by shot analysis of the trailer. They stated due to the pylon and nacelle shapes and positioning it was not the Big E. In the freeze frame they show, it appears they are correct.
     
  4. YARN

    YARN Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    It definitely looks like a Federation ship.

    Hit pause and look at those nacelle, however.

    They have a wider stance and appear to have TMP-style front-caps, definitely more slender.
     
  5. Finn

    Finn Bad Batch of TrekBBS Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    link please....
     
  6. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    It's something new for this movie is my guess.
     
  7. Unicron

    Unicron Boss Monster Mod Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Location:
    The Crown of the Moon
    After looking at it a bit more, I agree. The crashing ship doesn't match the E, but the rising ship might be the Enterprise.
     
  8. Admiral Buzzkill

    Admiral Buzzkill Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    The rising ship has the registry "NCC-17__" clearly visible.
     
  9. Shawnster

    Shawnster Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Location:
    Clinton, OH
    My guess is NX-Class starship. Further, after all the speculation, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest it's Captain Garth's original ship that had been kept in mothballs since is imprisonment.

    Either that or it's some other class of ship, since the villain is "detonating" the entire fleet.
     
  10. The Lensman

    The Lensman Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Location:
    The Lensman
    Yeah, that was my thought as well.

    I think that ship was a lot larger than the NX-01 was wasn't it? It seems larger to me....I liked all the new ships from the 2009 movie, so I'm totally cool with something new for this one.

    I do wonder if we'll have a scene where he causes several starships to fall to Earth, wreaking devastation. It'd be crazy awesome if so, IMO. ;)
     
  11. Vektor

    Vektor Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2001
    Location:
    Spokane, WA, USA
    It's not an NX class, not like the one Captain Archer commanded anyway. I'm sure it's just another new design created for this movie.
     
  12. MadMan1701A

    MadMan1701A Commodore Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Location:
    Milton, FL
    I hope some clearer pictures come out soon... I need to have time to build the 3D model before the movie comes out! :)

    -Ricky
     
  13. Kaiser

    Kaiser Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Location:
    Boyertown, PA as of July 2011
    i dunno i think more pics of that ship wont be out till around March or April of 2013 =/
     
  14. Shawnster

    Shawnster Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Location:
    Clinton, OH
    I've seen other people say the same thing, that it's not the correct size. Well, the Abrams Enterprise is larger than the TOS version, why should an Abrams NX stay 100% true to the Enterprise television series?

    Plus, I don't know what to check to determine scale. I've never seen the NX01 crash into an ocean (or whatever the water is) with the city in the background.

    Without a proper sense of scale, I couldn't say what the size is.

    Of course, NX class might not make sense. If they are staying true to Enterprise TV series, then we're talking about a century old starship. Of course, everyone keeps insisting that Scotty's reference about "Admiral Archer's beagle" was Enterprise's Jonathan Archer.
     
  15. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    ^ Enterprise was set before the timeline reset shenanigans, the NX-01 should be exactly as we saw it.
     
  16. Vektor

    Vektor Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2001
    Location:
    Spokane, WA, USA
    The ship in the teaser doesn't even look like the NX-01. Proportions are wrong, nacelles are differently shaped, support pylons taper in the wrong direction and have that funky bend in them, no outriggers on top of the primary hull, etc, etc.

    No reason to think it's anything other than some random new class of ship designed for this movie, just as they did with several never before seen classes in the last one.
     
  17. YARN

    YARN Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Even so, it's a promising looking shadow. It has a much wider stance than the nu-1701 and the nacelles don't look childishly "ample." Dare to dream of an eventual refit in the nu-Universe?

    Old-Spock is there, so he could certainly pass along some ship design advances. He already gave up the formula for transwarp beaming.
     
  18. WinstonSmith

    WinstonSmith Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Also, I would imagine if it were the NX (which it quite clearly isn't, but anyway, besides the point) they would have to pay royalties to someone (Doug Drexler, or maybe just to CBS I guess) to use it?
     
  19. B.J.

    B.J. Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Nah, it's characters they have to pay royalties on, not ship designs.
     
  20. Shawnster

    Shawnster Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Location:
    Clinton, OH

    And this is probably thecorrect answer/supposition