Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)_

Episode 3- "Treachery"

Well, Athelstan can't turn back now. He's killed an unarmed person. I found it fascinating that he doesn't seem to have a problems raiding and killing any defending soldiers but the death of the young monk who surprised him and the older priest took its emotional toll. Perhaps Athelstan views the former as legitimate combatants, ergo....he can live with that. Not with the old priest being humiliated or the young one's death as Athelstan panicked a bit.

I wonder if all the fanboys and fangirls who were whinging after the comic con sneak peak that, "OH MY GODS, NO! DID ROLLO KILL FLOKI??? THEY CAN'T KILL FLOKI!!!!!" feel pretty foolish at the moment. Floki's one cruel, vindictive son of a bitch who doesn't mind a little torture. I liked the directing and writing choices to have Ragnar physically separated from the actual torture of the old priest--and his hiding of the child. The main protagonist can't be seen enjoying violence and cruelty too much or he loses rooting value. Mellowing with age, perchance? Athelstan's influence? The child reminded him of Bjorn? Numerous vikings and Danes did settle in England (Northumbria, I believe) for the farming.

It's not out of left field that Ragnar would suggest it and that he would be shrewd enough to realize that making peace is an easier way to accomplish it. Of course King Horik felt the need to have a violent outburst and scuttle the moment. Both he and Jarl Borg need to die immediately. Jarl Borg really doesn't appreciate being left behind, does he?

Lagertha is breaking my heart. She's so strong and forceful, even in her acquiescence. Trying to secure a future for Bjorn with some money and land, I suppose, but she is going to end up killing this new husband. She has to. Challenge him like Ragnar challenged Earl Haraldson. That would be awesome. Katheryn Winnick is so athletic with all her martial arts training that I could see it happening.

Rollo, Rollo, Rollo...I've almost forgiven you. Siggy's willing to fight and die alongside you. Wake up and smell the coffee, dude. And I'm LOVING King Ecbert. King Ecbert of Wessex was the Anglo Saxon ruler at the start of the 9th century AD. Who is the actor? He's superb.

So--Athelstan cutting the priest's throat pretty much was a mercy killing, no? Opinions?

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Map of such stuff:



And mercy kill? Oh yes.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

I think Athelstan saw himself in that young monk. That was basically him several years ago, down to clutching a book (it even looked like the same cover). He definitely had the "what have I become?" look after the killing of the monk.

Floki was like this since the sack of Lindisfarne scene or the raid of the small Northumbrian town a couple episodes after that, where he murdered a priest for no reason. He's the most devoted to the Norse religion of all the characters, and his particular version of devotion is killing as many Christians as he can.

I think Ragnar is in the raiding business not for treasure or killing, but for the land. He wants to settle in England, not pillage and burn it and return to wherever he lives. Yeah, he's not a complete psycho like Floki.

Actually, if you watch that scene, the guy whom Horik murdered was counting the Vikings during the conversation between Ragnar and the priest. Horik probably thought that letting him go is too much of a risk. It doesn't make Horik less of a psycho though.

I love this character too, he seems very calm, very smart and seems like a very dangerous enemy. The historical Ecbert was grandfather of Alfred The Great.
The actor's name is Linus Roache, I haven't seen him in anything before Vikings.

Definitely mercy killing.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Oh yes, Alfred the Great. I've read a bit about him. One of the most fascinating Anglo Saxon kings if not the most. Britain's history is compelling. It's also shaped by Vikings and Northmen to a degree most don't realize, especially since the Vikings pretty much were the forebears of the Normans. These Vikings are the ancestors of all we Americans of northern European descent. Ragnar and Lagertha are gramps and granny to us.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

There's a great three-part documentary about Alfred and his children/grandchildren. This is the first part:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L2fYvguLL0
The second and the third are also on Youtube last time I checked. Very interesting stuff about the birth of England as a united kingdom.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Thank you!! I'll be watching right now.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Why? Other women, old men, and anyone else who could lift a weapon was ready to fight to save their village.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Siggy is a woman who's lost her husband and her position; she's a woman whose two sons were murdered and whose daughter was lost to the plague. Then her friend and protector, Lagertha, left because of Ragnar's actions. The one man she seems to care for is a drunk. She's had a horrific road in life so far. Better to die in battle and see the gods and all that. Siggy does seem to love Rollo. From my perspective it's not such a stretch that she'd be willing to die beside him after all she's seen. Women probably believed in Valhalla as well. Over all, the Vikings seemed more ready to face death than your average Josephine.

Oh, great documentary on Alfred, Shurik. I admire his commitment to education, even for the common folk. To me, that makes him admirable among men and kings.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Once of the things I find interesting about early English history is that it's punctuated by three "Germanic" invasions.

The Anglo-Saxon invasion in the Fifth Century, which ended the Romano-British era.

The Viking Invasions in the Eighth and Ninth Centuries which resulted in the majority of England being under Scandinavian rule.

The Norman Invasion in the Ninth Century which Anglo Saxon rule.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Agreed, thanks for the link, Shurik. Neil Oliver has a great series about the vikings that is well worth watching, too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H_gfusCt9Q

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Three parts, 2 hours each? I know what I'll watch during this weekend
In the documentary about Alfred, I think that the story of his daughter Aethelflaed is even more interesting than Alfred's. She and her brother, Edward the Elder, were those who finally stopped the Viking attempts to raid Wessex and pushed them back into Northumbria from most parts of England.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

Episode 4:

- I thought that the crucifixion scene was another dream, but no, Athelstan does gets crucified just like the old priest said to him in the previous episode. That was hard to watch. I don't think he'll be seeing Ragnar any time soon (or ever).

- "I see an eagle, and the eagle is your destiny, Jarl Borg". Three guesses as to what will happen to Jarl Borg.

- Loved the reunion scene between Ragnar, Lagertha and Bjorn. Lagertha's new husband is a major asshole and will probably die horribly.

- I wonder what Ecbert proposed to Ragnar. Historically, Ecbert did manage to subdue Mercia and Northumbia and sort of rule over most of what's now England. Maybe he asked Ragnar to raid and weaken other Saxon kingdoms to help Ecbert take over them and get land there afterwards.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

I was thinking the same thing.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

There's plenty of time still for angst between Bjorn and Ragnar. Bjorn won't be any fonder of princess "I'm too good to stay in a dirty place" ass log than he was before. His mother rather shines in comparison, and Ragnar is destined to be overshadowed by Bjorn according to the old seer.

Who knows what's in store for Athelstan? King Ecbert is pretty damn clever ordering Athelstan's reprieve. He could be a most useful tool to assess the Viking strengths and weaknesses having lived with the enemy for so long and understanding their language. Why the hell was Ragnar so passive agressive pissy with him anyway Because he didn't jump to his heels to go back to Scandanavia? Athelstan speaks English. It made sense for him to stay but all Ragnar could do was pout. I wanted to smack him.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

I think he appreciated Athelstan's reasons for staying, but was hoping personal loyalty to Ragnar and his family would weigh heavier. It was short sighted of Ragnar and Horik to cut out Jarl Borg like they did. His looking to strike back as he did shouldn't have been unforeseen given the recent past.

Ragnar's going back isn't surprising but it is leaving Horik with a greatly diminished force in a hostile territory. Athelstan is one of the few who can communicate with ease here, and whom Ragnar can trust left behind to watch out for his interests. I think, hope at least, Ragnar will see the bigger picture after his family is safe. Right now, he's too focused on them to really care about the larger possibilities he had in mind for land and settlement when they'd arrived earlier.

 

Re: Vikings season 2 episodes discussions (spoilers inside, of course)

The sad thing is that Princess Aslaug was a far more important character in Viking history/mythology than Lagertha and a Warrior Woman to boot. They made Lagertha too sympathetic and likable for the transition from her to Aslaug to be acceptable by the viewers.

...Unless they were deliberately trying to make Aslaug unlikable.