The OFFICIAL STNG-R general discussion thread!

Discussion in 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' started by jefferiestubes8, May 14, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AviTrek

    AviTrek Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Correct, which is why the PAL audience will see the correct speed for the first time with this process.
     
  2. Warp Coil

    Warp Coil Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2001
    Location:
    NYC
    If the plan is to air TNG-R in syndication, they'll need 30 fps for Broadcast in the U.S. The networks I work for air everything 1080i 59.94.
     
  3. Captrek

    Captrek Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Location:
    Captrek
    BluRays support both 24fps (1080p/24) and 60fps (1080p). TNG was made for TV, so my guess is that it was filmed at 30fps and the BluRays will be 1080p. 1080p/24 is generally used for movies.
     
  4. JJohnson

    JJohnson Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    That would be why my copy of Voyager makes Chakotay sound a much higher pitch than I remember...I got PAL versions. No wonder. I can't wait for Blu-Rays so I can hear them at the correct speed and pitch.
     
  5. The Laughing Vulcan

    The Laughing Vulcan Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Location:
    At The Laughing Vulcan's party...
    That's the danger of knowing a little and not enough to start spouting jargon.

    There definitely is something used to standards convert NTSC-PAL without speedup. I've watched far too much anime released in the UK and have experienced the blended frames, judder and ghosting that results from forcing 24 frames (or 30) into 25.

    Usually they average out the frames, so that you get some blending (it looks like one frame overlapping the next), and it's pretty smooth, if at the lower resolution of NTSC 480i scaled up to 576i it's still soft.

    The cheapest conversion, and the one I hate the most, is where they simply repeat the 24th frame to create the 25th. The runtime is maintained, the audio untouched, but the video looks like jerkovision, with pans and scrolls jumping once a second.

    Here's a wiki on it

    I go cross-eyed halfway down the page... :confused:
     
  6. Maxwell Everett

    Maxwell Everett Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    TNG was shot 24fps for the live action portions. 40 seconds into the promo, it tells us to expect 1080p/24 (or technically, 23.976)
     
  7. Maxwell Everett

    Maxwell Everett Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Just noticed this on the Amazon page for the Next Level disc:

    Special Features
    - Star Trek: The Next Generation - Next Level Promo
    - Star Trek Padd - iPad App Promo spot
    - Star Trek - The Next Generation teaser promo

    Next Level Promo (the one we're all familiar with):
    [yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DZEcKM33YY[/yt]

    iPad App Promo spot (also already available):
    [yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHp3uuTchZI[/yt]


    So, it looks like all we're going to get that's new in the way of special features is probably a Season 1 promo of unknown length -- there doesn't seem to be a VFX featurette (on this disc anyway.) :(
     
  8. gaghyogi49

    gaghyogi49 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Location:
    Germany
    According to the listing of the Blu-ray on the official German Paramount page, the sample disk will indeed include a promo trailer for TNG Season 1:

    http://www.paramount.de/Programm/1875/
     
  9. Dick_Valentine

    Dick_Valentine Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK (Not Alabama)
    Yeah it was an anniversary special that had "Ultimately human" a combination of DS9/Voyager bloopers that IIRC never turned up anywhere but Youtube afterwards.

    Though bizarrely every time I've seen it since I've only seen the Voyager bloopers with the DS9 ones edited out of it, so either it did make it to a Voyager DVD release or a rabid Voyager fan couldn't take it that the DS9 bloopers were funnier and got rid of them!

    (And they were, IIRC, Sisko telling Q that he'd ravish him and tripping up over his raised office door ledge with Riker vs Janeway saying " contact Star Trek" instead of Starfleet or something)

    Then I'll reiterate what I've said since we found out they weren't remaking the SFX, this is a job done on the cheap to make some money.
    Its not a fan-friendly experience, they had the opportunity to go through all the footage, cut out scenes, bloopers etc and give the fans many extras, but they just want to do the bare minimum they can to maximise their profits.

    Get with the program folks, this is just a money making scheme, not some fan experience chock a block with unseen nuggets.

    That might come in 10 more years if they figure they can make some more money off of us...
     
  10. Harvey

    Harvey Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    Of course they're out to make money. But painstaking work to re-composite each visual effects and (only when the original doesn't hold muster) re-creating the effects in HD is hardly a cash grab or "the bare minimum."
     
  11. Rarewolf

    Rarewolf Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2002
    Location:
    Devon, England
    I think it's just the fact that finding the 'nuggets' would largely be an inexpensive side effect of doing the required work, certainly cheaper to index it all then, than go back again later. Accessing the vaults should be a one time process.
     
  12. Harvey

    Harvey Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    And who says that stuff won't be on the season sets? This 4-episode release is just a preview to generate some buzz (and some money) before a whole season is ready for release.
     
  13. sojourner

    sojourner Admiral In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Location:
    Just around the bend.
    This really illustrates a lack of understanding in what is being done for the blueray edition.
     
  14. ATimson

    ATimson Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Location:
    Andrew Timson
    There's finding it... and then there's paying lawyers (and participants) for clearance. :techman:
     
  15. Dick_Valentine

    Dick_Valentine Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK (Not Alabama)
    And that completes your RDA of patronising for today, nice to hit your targets, isn't it? :techman:

    I do know what is going on, but compared to the rescanning and re-compositing that they're doing, fishing us out a few deleted scenes and a few bloopers isn't going to be a huge undertaking but doesn't seem to be part of their modus operandi.

    Giving us a few extra trinkets might tempt those like me who aren't exactly tempted by 1980s filming looking better through HD ....
     
  16. Tosk

    Tosk Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2001
    Location:
    On the run.
    This should go without saying, but you're basing this off of a SAMPLER disc that isn't even out yet.
     
  17. Captain Robert April

    Captain Robert April Vice Admiral Admiral

    Plus, they're gonna have their hands full just digging up the stuff they're actually looking for and re-editing all the episodes. Putting together a blooper reel is not gonna be on anybody's priority list (and that's assuming they even kept the outtakes; like I said, Berman was against gag reels, especially at the time).
     
  18. trekfan_1

    trekfan_1 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Do you have a predisposition for being negative/jumping the gun?

    Fact#1: Recompositing and redoing post production is an enormous task and pretty much unprecedented. Not "done on the cheap”. Ever time I see someone make that kind of comment I cant help to laugh. Search online and you will find almost no one seeing the studio ever doing this. Most were saying " Paramount will be cheap and do a video up convert." We should be grateful they are even going through all the trouble of re-editing a 20 year old show. All 176 episodes of it. That's the equivalent of re-editing over 80 feature films. How can that be considered "cheap"? Now if they simply were up converting the video masters than I would whole heartedly agree with you on the cheap part.

    Fact #2: THIS IS A SAMPLER DISC! Expecting allot of special features on a test disc is like expecting a 3 course meal out of an appetizer. Please be patient. I'm sure the season sets will have meatier bonus material.

    And about the SFX. Honestly, after what George Lucas did to Star Wars, I think staying true to the originals is the way to go for better or for worse. Especially since the workmanship and design work done for the models were handled with so much care and attention. HD will help us see allot the detail that was lost. For me, squeeky clean CGI has no "soul" to it. It's just too cookie cutter for my likeing. This ofcourse is just my opinion.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2011
  19. Trek Survivor

    Trek Survivor Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    ...Which I 100% completely agree with!
     
  20. Dick_Valentine

    Dick_Valentine Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK (Not Alabama)
    I'll admit I was in a bad mood last night by the previous poster's rudeness and I flew off the handle a bit, I apologise for that.

    It is just from my point of view, TNG is a closed shop.
    I've seen it all 1000000 times and I don't fancy shelling out to see it another time even if it does look a lot sprucier this time.
    Q will still get petulant and throw the ship to meet the Borg, the "mysterious shadow" will still be Sela, Spock will still talk about cowboy diplomacy, etc.

    Yet I still love the show and for some reason badly want to justify putting my hand in my pocket (to buy a blu-ray player/PS3 as well as the DVDs themselves, not the stuff of whims!) and getting this and just, for whatever stupid reason, to see something "new" for my money.
    Whether that be special effects or previously unseen material of any kind (and I admit now I jumped the gun on that after getting confused about what was being discussed, box set details or sampler, apologies!)

    So all that fanboy desire for something new coupled with my cheapness not wanting to buy something I've already seen albiet much better looking came across as negativity, I apologise.

    I have waffled on long enough and shall now return to browsing the thread hoping for better news with each sucessive update! :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.