Can East River along Queens be filled in ?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by DumbDumb2007, Jan 14, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DumbDumb2007

    DumbDumb2007 Commander

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Location:
    United States
    Can the East River between Roosevelt Island and Queens simply be filled in ? the whole island could be redevolped with subways and extensions of Queens Blvd and the LIE bringing people closer to Manhattan. whole new subways and a new underground train station, Penn Station 2 or Jamaica train station 2 could be built there.
     
  2. TerriO

    TerriO Writer-type human Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Location:
    Doing a little bit of writing
    I'm not sure what this obsession of yours with NYC and eliminating all of the waterways around it is, but fill land is not that stable. Look at the slurry walls needed to build the World Trade Center towers and the term "liquefaction" if you need any further information.
     
  3. M'Sharak

    M'Sharak Definitely Herbert. Maybe. Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Location:
    Terra Inlandia
    What could or could not be built on the new acreage aside, filling in the East River would also have a significant (and, I suspect, extremely undesirable) effect on tidal flows into and out of western Long Island Sound. It would almost certainly bung up the balance of the entire marine ecosystem in that area and very probably lead to its complete or near-complete silting-in.
     
  4. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Trekker4747
    If I'm not mistaken, a good bit of Chicago is built on the landfill ruins after the Chicago fire.

    You'd never be able to build huge, tall, buildings on landfill and you'd need to pack it and let it settle for a few years before really trying to build and I even think some of New York is already built on landfill.

    So I think it's possible.

    Hell. New York has to do SOMETHING with all their garbage.
     
  5. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    DumbDumb posts questions like this all over the site, I'm afraid.
     
  6. TerriO

    TerriO Writer-type human Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Location:
    Doing a little bit of writing
    Dude, we're not in TNZ, I can't actually comment on that without having to warn myself. That's just mean. :p


    Folks, I'm pretty sure I know what we're all thinking here. However, let's try to give the benefit of the doubt and actually try to discuss the subject, please?

    Thanks. :)
     
  7. ex nihilo

    ex nihilo Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Location:
    Confined to Room 101
    If I may be so bold . . .

    Both quotes above are not accurate. Japan has built numerous structures on land “reclaimed” from Tokyo Bay through the process of infill. Liquefaction is a concern, since Japan is seismically active in the extreme, but the Japanese have engineered ways to mitigate this. Nearly 250 square kilometers of the Bay have been reclaimed since the Meiji era.

    As for building large structures on reclaimed land, Japan’s largest skyscraper, the multiuse Landmark Tower, is built in the Minato Mirai 21 district (Port Future 21, also know colloquially as “Futuristic Town”) of Yokohama, which is largely (over 2/3) built on reclaimed land.

    Now, as to the OP’s original purpose I cannot fathom to guess. Japan, and the megalopolis that consists of Tokyo and the cities surrounding it, is unique in the sense that land is at a premium. Here in the States land is still quite abundant leaving more cost effective options open to developers. Jeez, if a business wanted to stay on Manhattan Island, there are plenty of areas that are in dire need of revitalization and reuse.
     
  8. TerriO

    TerriO Writer-type human Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Location:
    Doing a little bit of writing
    Condensing all of these threads into one at this thread.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.