We could build anything if we put our minds into it.

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous' started by steveda19, Nov 17, 2014.

  1. steveda19

    steveda19 Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    We have the technolgy to do it. Lets face it. If NASA can build a space shuttle that flies a million miles orbiting the earth and re use it and it lasted for over 30 years. We can build a car last 50 years over 2 million miles. We can build a car that can run without gas and uses no oil by running on solar and electric power that goes unlimited by solar during day driving and 500 miles per charge. We could build electric panels on major highways so cars could run as far where we want to go. We could even build an spacecraft that can take man to mars and the moon and back. We can colonize the moon. Why are we holding back? We should built these ideas.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2014
  2. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    Why the heck would you want to colonize the moon.
     
  3. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    Because it's next.
     
  4. steveda19

    steveda19 Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Because Humanity needs to start exploring space. Cause if anything happens down on earth humans on the moon should prepare for the next step.
     
  5. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain

    Well cars can last over 50 years, and engines can last for hundreds of thousands of miles if maintened correctly.

    As for what's holding us back, pick any number of issues on this planet that need we need to sort out.

    Realestically speaking any manned missions beyond Orbital flight would have to be an International effort.
     
  6. steveda19

    steveda19 Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    We gotta start advancing technology. Advance it far beyond computers. Like solar,wireless and satellite communications.
     
  7. Australis

    Australis Writer - Australis Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Location:
    The Edge of Reality
    Commewrcial viability in a capitalist system. We have to get past that idea first and foremost.
     
  8. Sector 7

    Sector 7 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Location:
    Rural North Carolina
    Exactly! Unless it is profitable, widespread technological advances do not happen. Sadly, this is true. :vulcan:
     
  9. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain
    Well either profitability or if it's politcally advantageous.
     
  10. iguana_tonante

    iguana_tonante Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Location:
    Italy, EU
    Well, that's a nice idea. What are you doing?
     
  11. Green Shirt

    Green Shirt Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Location:
    Here
    Why are we still driving cars powered by technology over 100 years old? Because that's what the car companies want. :devil:
     
  12. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain
    ^Well the Oil companies, a doubt a car company cares whether we buy a car powered by an internal combustion engine or an electric engine.
     
  13. Timewalker

    Timewalker Cat-lovin', Star Trekkin' Time Lady Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Location:
    In many different universes, simultaneously.
    Some people with mobility and other medical problems on Earth would find life easier in a 1/6th-gravity environment.

    As others have said, it's the next (logical) step. We can't go from Earth to a Star Trek-like future (or whatever SF future is your ideal) without intermediate steps. Therefore, a Moon colony is logical.

    Asking "why would you want to colonize the Moon" is akin to asking "why would you want to send humans off the planet anywhere, including orbiting in a shuttle or space station." In my opinion, of course.

    Our planet is finite. Some day we will need to expand elsewhere.
     
  14. B.J.

    B.J. Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    I'll just address the spacecraft part. Step one: get funding. Get back to me when you've solved that.

    Beyond that, the rest of this is just armchair engineering. To put it simply, space is hard. REALLY hard. I've been an aerospace engineer for the last 17 years, but mostly on aircraft programs. A couple years ago I got the opportunity to work on some spacecraft programs, and there were all kinds of new constraints and issues that I hadn't even thought of or considered before. (Coatings commonly used in aircraft that would vaporize and potentially kill astronauts, atomic oxygen eating up seals, micrometeoroid damage, lubricants vaporizing, etc etc etc.........) And that's just for structures! I can't even think of what the systems people have to deal with!
     
  15. Green Shirt

    Green Shirt Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Location:
    Here
    Thanks, that's what I really meant. But it is true for car companies also, in the sense that is what they're currently selling and would cost many fortunes to retool their product.
     
  16. MacLeod

    MacLeod Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    Location:
    Great Britain
    True but they are now starting to build electric/hybrid cars more than they used to. As well as making internal combustion engine more fficent as fuel efficency can be a selling point these days.
     
  17. Green Shirt

    Green Shirt Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Location:
    Here
    Maybe that's just a tease, or a half hearted attempt to make it look like they're doing something innovative.
     
  18. steveda19

    steveda19 Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    There always room for improvement. Like why not try to use the suns engery? The sooner we start advancing technology the sooner we can get in trek technology.
     
  19. steveda19

    steveda19 Lieutenant Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Let me give you another example. Did you know medical technology has advanced than from the 70s? People are living longer today then from the 70s era. And did you know open heart surgery could be a thing in the past?


    http://healthblog.ncpa.org/could-bypass-surgery-become-a-thing-of-the-past/

    We are getting closer to Dr McCoys medicene
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2014
  20. Australis

    Australis Writer - Australis Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Location:
    The Edge of Reality
    You'll have to tell us more about that at some point, I knew space would be difficulty but hadn't considered some of those (eg, atomic oxygen).

    Also, we can't build an interstellar drive (yet) and we haven't properly worked out cryogenics to make an ark ship feasible (yet). Not to say it won't happen, but as per the above, the challenges are huge.

    Also:
    Absolutely. But we have a Govt here goign backwards on solar and wind energy technology, to our great shame, at the behest of Big Coal. Politics and money, it gets us every time.

    As for medical advances, I think they are going to explode oever the next ten years. I just wish a few of them had happened sooner (and I guess we all do).