Roger Wilco wrote:
Hard to say what-if, but I think claiming that the result of the game would have been exactly the same without Harvin, minus 7 points or maybe 14 if you're being generous isn't far-fetched. That pretty much takes Harvin out of MVP contention by definition.
Don't think that's true at all.
Even when he didn't have the ball, they had to account for him.
That, and that TD return for a TD stuck the nail in the coffin.