Re: Mars One - Unethical?
My conclusion about the NET beneficial effects of climate change up to 2080 is supported by the peer reviewed scientific consensus.
Is it a perfect prediction? Of course NOT; but it's the best prediction available.
And it is very, VERY far from the 'we ruined our planet' doom and gloom of Spirit of Christmas Present
You, on the other hand, have posted no links to peer-reviewed papers to support your apocalyptic prophecy. It's, de facto, a religious belief.
Are you per chance implying that 2013 IPCC contradicts my linked to papers? If so where?
Totally off topic, but I'm curious. Why do you link to someone's profile when you address them in your posts?
I like how it looks on the page and it's easy to do.
"Let truth and falsehood grapple ... Truth is strong" - John Milton