View Single Post
Old November 22 2013, 07:15 PM   #148
Warped9's Avatar
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: No female starship captains in the 2250s-60s?

What I'm getting out of all this is that some seem to be asserting that an unconcious assumption (on the part of the writers) is to be taken as a de facto assertion that women cannot command in the TOS era. And that latent assumption is supposed to trump everything else seen in the series. I know Christopher and others are not arguing that, but some others (like the OP) seem to be taking that tack as "This is what the writers really meant."

Maybe I'm thick but I don't see that latent assumption screaming all over the screen in that episode. I can see it if someone chooses to parse it so finely just to say, "There it is! It's a fact!"

It's only there if one is looking for it and chooses to blow it all out of proportion.
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote