Also, which I think is one of the important points that tsq
was making, as soon as the end of the first paragraph and the beginning of the second, the Wikipedia article
Research has demonstrated that children can remember events from before the age of 3–4 years, but that these memories decline as children get older.
Research has shown that children have the capacity to remember events that happened to them from age 1 and before whilst they are still relatively young, but as they get older they tend to be unable to recall memories from their youngest years.
That really shoots down the notion that infants and toddlers are generally biologically unable to form memories. The reason that adult recollection of memories from so young is rare is not simply because the memories can't be encoded, but because they either become inaccessible or are erased years after they were formed.
That's really a significant departure from what sonak
was initially asserting.