Well that's DC's explanation.
You can chose to believe in Santa Claus too.
Williams claims that he (and his creative partner) gave the editorial department a years warning before the editors swooped in and nixed the wedding.
Surely that means that the wedding should have been grandfathered in, or that 364 days of approval should ave trumped one day of disapproval? Or are we supposed to beleive that the no weddings for any one rule was already in effect a year ago and they just forgot?
Besides, it doesn't matter why DC said "no" to a gay marriage when they should have been sensible enough to predict the optics and roll with it.