View Single Post
Old September 30 2013, 05:49 AM   #5
SeerSGB
Admiral
 
SeerSGB's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
Re: Why didn't Spock set the self-destruct?

Maurice wrote: View Post
I thought the warheads were already there, but Khan swapped the tubes for the fuel cells.
That's the impression I got. Otherwise, Carol would have noticed as soon as they pulled the access panel offf that the missiles were duds.


Flying Spaghetti Monster wrote: View Post
I agree.

But then, there's all kind of things they overlooked.

I always wondered at exactly what point Marcus and Khan stopped being allies. By extention, I wondered why Khan beamed to Kronos at all.. was he personally interested in having the Federation start a war with the Klingons? These two questions seem unconnected at first, but once you look at the plot, story, and details, you realized that certain plot elements were not worked out.

Also, I know that 72 was the number that the writers had been handd on a silver platter from the original episode, but it's an ungainly number. It would require more torpedo launchers than the Enterprise has (until the CG people had aplaced a few on the side but not nearly enough) and it was too much for Spock to have people take out the cryo-tubes and install explosives.

I watch the film for the performances.
Maybe the transwarp-transporter was coordinated locked for the Klingon Homeworld.
__________________
- SeerSGB -
Good men don't need rules, The Doctor (A Good Man Goes To War)
SeerSGB is offline   Reply With Quote