Re: State of Trek according to Entertainment Weekly
What's really putrid is that the fanboys are insistent on perpetrating and re-stating the blatant lie that those who didn't think it was worth gushing over are somehow a small but vocal minority. They make up a very large portion if not half of the total amount of people who saw it. If you count those who just thought it was "meh" and nothing particularly special, that percentage rises even farther. It wasn't worth gushing over unless you simply aren't aware of writing standards, actually good films or are easily amused due to being unfit. "Good"? Yes. "Watchable"? Yes. "New-Age"? Definitely. "The new standard"? Only if you're uneducated in several key areas that would affect your ability to determine such a thing.
I have no idea what you're on about?
Shouldn't we be asking that the movies we pay to see be "good" and "watchable"?
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill