Re: Star Trek: Section 31: Disavowed - Dec. 2014?
David Mack wrote:
The Wormhole wrote:
Although I would not presume to speak for David Mack, I do get the impression that he pitched a Section 31 story because it's a story he wanted to tell and their presence in STID in no way influenced the decision. But I do not presume to speak for David Mack.
And yet you are 100% correct. Well done.
But it have influenced the editor's decision to give the novel the goahead?
Star Trek Imponderables
, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1