^I'm not saying anything is "obvious." I'm just saying there's not a complete lack of evidence. I don't disagree with you that it could've been promoted more
clearly by having a "Book 1" indication, but I'm just saying that there was some evidence that it was part of a larger whole, that you're overstating your case when you say there was no indication whatsoever
. As with most things, the truth is between the extreme positions.