View Single Post
Old August 18 2013, 06:49 PM   #10
Re: Constellation Class: Excelsior "back-up" plan?

Timo wrote: View Post
The two things that the Reliants and Constellations have in common to me are their large shuttlebay doors and volume.
The one further thing they share is twin "impulse deflection crystals" (by virtue of the Constellation having two impulse engine sets, and the Miranda having those blue domes both atop and below). Perhaps impulse acceleration is another thing that was lacking in the Constitution-refits and helped seal their fate?

The Constellation class were never a back-up plan for the Excelsior. The USS Constellation itself went on a one year trail run even before the Excelsior had left the shipyard.
This would be no contradiction of the backup idea. Naturally, the "safe" alternative would reach trials stage faster than the "risky" one!

Interestingly, the Constellation herself is listed as still undergoing warp trials as of ST6:TUC, in a background graphic that admittedly cannot be read on screen but OTOH is meant to be a "serious" in-universe readout for a rare once, rather than a combination of gibberish and in-jokes. Might be that the "safe" alternative wasn't so safe after all, and the four-nacelle configuration presented so many problems that the Constellation was in fact an expensive failure in the end.

Timo Saloniemi
The USS. Hathaway NCC-2593, another Constellation class starship was mention in TNG episode Peck Performance that the Hathaway was 80 years old. They said that the episode itself had taking place in 2365. 80 from 2365 is 2285.
Which would mean that the USS. Constellation had already past it trail run test and was already on active service.

Also, there is the USS. Roosevelt NCC-2573 another Excelsior class starship would been ready for active service during the same time period.
yenny is offline   Reply With Quote