Captain Kathryn wrote:
Just saw this on the Wiki:
"Wired magazine gave it a plausibility score of 2 out of 10 as part of their 2012 Most Audacious Private Space Exploration Plans."
I'd say "2 out of 10" is giving the whole scheme way too much credibility. This is about as likely to happen as traveling to Mars via astral projection. Debating the ethics of the project is nothing more than a colossal wank.
But, hey, that's what we do, right? We're geeks!
But I am unsure what you meant by a colossal wank?
You mean since they probably won't do it anyway, debating ethics is too premature at this time?