Re: OT: I wish Pocket would do something like this
Yes, but consider the dynamic this causes: The people who get motivated to post reviews based on these rewards are most likely going to write positive reviews, because they're unlikely to have heard of the campaign if they're not fans, or unlikely to have much of an appetite for the rewards if they're not generally fans of the franchise. That means it hypothetically could have an effect on the positive-to-negative review ratio and computed average scores - with the goodwill mobilized essentially through bribes (well, "incentives"), not the quality of the original product. I think that makes the average score less useful than if the system worked free of that stimuli.
Of course, the counter-argument is that in the face of things like astroturfing happening anyway, someone who really wants to get a picture of the quality of a book has to actually dig deeper and read some reviews and purposefully expose themselves to differing viewpoints anyway.
Maybe. We have the reward
here of interacting w/ some of the Trek writers. Doesn't seem to stop us from telling their book rocked or sucked. I know winning something (potentially winning) can lead some to construct their opinions one way or another - so could knowing that if you write that Christopher's latest was dull or fantastic that he will read that could also influence an opinion.
Long live DS9!