I'd just like the movie to be discussed on its individual merits as opposed to continually wheeling out old Trek to discredit one's opinion.
So we shouldn't compare the actions of one Khan vs. another because that makes the older stuff look just as silly and inconsistent?
Khan misreading the people of the 23rd century isn't exactly a creation of Star Trek Into Darkness.
If you can make the claim that Khan in the latest movie isn't very smart and makes mistakes and claim that makes the latest movie bad. Then it's fair to bring up the fact that those characteristics are consistent with the way the character has been portrayed in the past.