Says the chap whose ingenuity in sorting out the times when Trek writers said the same is legendary!
Well, that's different. Trek
has usually made some effort at consistency and credibility, even though it often falls short. Who
has generally been more unrepentantly a fanciful tall tale, a ripping yarn where believability is not a priority. It's tended to have a much more improvisational approach to its worldbuilding, and that's part of its charm. I feel that trying to discipline it into a cohesive, logical continuity is doing it a disservice.