View Single Post
Old June 18 2013, 03:39 AM   #19
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: what do people want star trek 3 to be like

Sran wrote: View Post
Ovation wrote: View Post
Cumberbatch is a far more versatile and talented actors than Montalban was.
Because you say so. End of discussion.

--Sran
Glad you see it my way, then. Excellent.
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
-Brett- wrote: View Post
People wanted Khan, and Khan turned out to be the weak link in the movie. So now I want them to ignore what people want.
From what I gathered, people EXPECTED Khan, but didn't neccessarily WANT Khan.

Ovation wrote: View Post
No.

Cumberbatch is a far more versatile and talented actors than Montalban was. I quite enjoy WOK and I remember seeing it at the cinema in 1982. Was watching TOS for about a decade by then. And I still prefer 2013 Khan to 1982/1967 Khan. So your attempt to speak for more than yourself fails (as it does all the other tiresome times some posters here do so).
Now let's not shit on the actor just to elevate some film. For a hispanic actor born in the 1920s, Montalbans body of work in American TV and film is absolutely incredible.
I was not "shitting on" Montalban. If anything, I was "shitting on" the tiresome efforts made by some posters to speak on behalf of others when they clearly lack the mandate to do so. That is something I will always rebut when I encounter it.
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote