Lt. Cheka Wey wrote:
And other old Trek references which they felt obligated to do to keep the hardcore trekkies happy ( i watched almost all Trek episodes and read some books but i don't care for easter eggs in the new movie) they would had casted one of the old captains is a major role in Into Darknesss? I feel that the Tribble, Spock and thei am a doctor... kind of detract for the plot. I feel that way they could had made the hardcore fans more happy and the plot would be more straightforward and focused. Weller did a good job but Stewart or Books or Mulgre could had done just as well.
1. Why are the Tribble, Spock and thei am doctor. . . detracting to the plot?
2. If the easter eggs are bad, why wouldn't having Stewart or Brooks or Mulgrew been bad?
3. If having Stewart or Brooks or Mulgrew is good, why is having the easter eggs bad?