View Single Post
Old June 5 2013, 04:13 AM   #1
Praetor Baldric
Lieutenant Commander
Roddenberry, Solow, & Justman

So I recently finished reading the Solow/Justman book and I have a better understanding now about all the Roddenberry-bashing that has come out since its publication. The consensus among readers tends to be that Roddenberry was essentially an opportunistic money-grubbing jerk who was less than charming to work with. The book and the subsequent discussions which have come up have led me to ask two questions:

1) Was Roddenberry really any that different from anyone trying to make it in the cut-throat world of television during those days?

2) Why is it so much easier to accept Solow/Justman's version of things and discredit Roddenberry where the opinion of the latter differs from that of the former party? Isn't it possible that Solow/Justman are capable of bending the truth (or remembering things differently) to suit their own purposes? Why do many automatically assume that GR is full of it?
Praetor Baldric is offline   Reply With Quote