View Single Post
Old June 2 2013, 12:47 AM   #76
zekkie
Rear Admiral
 
zekkie's Avatar
 
Location: Canterbury, CT
View zekkie's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK: a series treatment starring APRIL and COLT

Belz... wrote: View Post
zekkie wrote: View Post
i appreciate criticism, but not veiled attempts at trying to paint me as a hack who has $25.
I don't think that was the idea. You made a point that it was registered with the WGA to make it more impressive. Maurice simply pointed out that it's not impressive.

the timeline can be reconciled. it's called inventive storytelling.
You can't reconcile two contradictory things: in one timeline, there's a Vulcan in 2268. In the other, there is not after 2258. You'll have a hard time "reconciling" that. But that's not the point. The point is that nobody will care about that.



Yes, in supplementary material. They could change it without problem, since it was never stated onscreen.



I don't really watch tv anymore, but do they still do that nowadays ?

I want to give them Kirk and Spock, if you'll read a bit
In how many years ? Again: this treatment sounds like a pitch for you or fans, not the general public or studio guys.

the criticism in this thread has basically amounted to equivocation, without review of the material.
I assume you posted here to get honest evaluation of your treatment. If you're going to treat your critics like people who don't know what they are talking about, then you are doomed to failure.

I do hope you report back here to tell us of your success or failure, however. In the interest of honesty of course.
i intend to.

like i mentioned, i don't mind productive, warranted criticism. i've received no criticism but character attacks and equivocation.

WHO THE F* pissed in y'alls cheerios, in that you need to be rude and confrontational?

this has been a mob. entirely adversarial, and there is no good reason as to why...

not that i can't take it, or that it's changing my attitude.
zekkie is offline   Reply With Quote