View Single Post
Old May 23 2013, 05:26 PM   #41
Warped9's Avatar
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post

How is acknowledging what Trek has always been "bringing it down"? Honestly, if people didn't keep trying to compare Abrams movies to the rest of the franchise (with the rose-tinted nostalgia glasses on), the comparisons would likely stop.
In fairness when you label something with a familiar name then comparisons are inevitable.

Every time there's a new version of 007 or Superman (or whatever) it's always compared with previous versions.
Of course. But before you make those comparisons, take off the rose-tinted nostalgia glasses. I don't know how many times I've watched someone scream about how something Abrams did "wasn't Star Trek", yet had been done multiple times before in other Trek series including TOS.
When it comes to entertainment today the "rose tinted glasses" argument doesn't have the weight it once had for the simple reason is that today you can see the earlier versions right away in the here-and-now right alongside the new and not have to rely solely on memory.
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline