View Single Post
Old May 19 2013, 06:44 PM   #101
Vice Admiral
T'Girl's Avatar
Location: Turkeystan
Re: Saucer Separation

DonIago wrote: View Post
While the saucer having the ability to cruise at warp would resolve some dangling episode inconsistencies, I don't believe it was the writers' intention that the saucer have warp drive ...
At this point you then have to come up with a reason for the saucer NOT to be equipped with a warp drive of some capacity.

In the Star Trek universe, every vessel above the size of a work-bee gets to have a warp drive. A two person shuttle pod is so equipped. What possible reason could there be for the designers of the saucer to make the conscious decision to exclude a warp drive? I'm not talking about some monster warp nine plus propulsion, but something in the warp three or four realm. Starfleet does seem to favor external nacelles, however they are apparently not a requirement, many of the non-Starfleet ships we see do not have external nacelles. As a emergency only propulsion, enclosing a warp drive internally in the area aft of the main shuttle bay may have been deemed sufficient.

C.E. Evans wrote: View Post
The same thing applies to lifeboats in general. They're not really intended to be starships in their own right, but emergency craft for survivors/evacuees until a rescue ship arrives.
As noted above, something the size of a two person shuttlepods has a warp drive.

It would seem to me, given missions of long range exploration out in the Federation's "boonies" and beyond, that the Enterprise's lifeboats would all have a warp drive. Depending on where the abandoning of the ship occurred, rescue might be years in the future.

If the first can have a warp drive ... why not the second?

T'Girl is online now   Reply With Quote