View Single Post
Old May 9 2013, 03:40 PM   #17
Rear Admiral
Tosk's Avatar
Location: On the run.
Re: Do we take "fanon" too literally?

Deckerd wrote: View Post
The Wormhole wrote: View Post
It works both ways. There are those who follow a strict adherance that only that which is firmly established on screen should count.
But that is the definition of canon.
Not really. Discounting the religious uses of the word, canon simply means 'a standard'. As far as Trek is concerned, canon is fanon. Or fanon is canon. I forget.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote