View Single Post
Old May 2 2013, 10:44 PM   #908
Kruezerman's Avatar
Location: The corner of San Antonio and a bottle of Fireball

ConRefit79 wrote: View Post
Flake wrote: View Post
Some more negative reviews, and aintitcoolnews both hated it.
From Coming Soon Review:
There's much more to be said about the sheer incompetence of "Into Darkness" on a narrative level, but it can wait until the "spoiler" threat has fully cleared. Anxious fans, however, would do well to remember Mr. Spock's wise words from "Amok Time":

"After a time," he says, "you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."

"The Bottom Line:
It's hard not to wonder if the reason Abrams is so big on secrecy in the first place is because he knows his mystery box is empty. This is a "Star Trek" film designed for audiences distracted by shiny objects. Die hard fans -- and the moviegoing public in general -- deserve better than this shameful franchise entry."
Sounds like somebody just in to rock the boat.
"Stop going on and on about your diet.. Just eat your salad and be sad."
Kruezerman is online now   Reply With Quote