"I am truly taken aback?"
I don't know--are you?
at any rate, yes, the additional footage needed for the DE would of course require the entire framing portion surrounding the extended footage.
But as can be seen in the Peter Preston footage---it's mostly one long uncut take---so that 50 second section would be in one piece in one place.
They had the footage in 1985 when they did the ABC cut and in 2002 when the did the DVD DE edition.
It was incompetence (as they claimed in 2009) OR it was simple greed (setting up a double dip) that prevented the DE from being on Blu.
Not the lack of footage.
I don't mind you pointing out that they are alternate takes were used for some of the additions, I just find it lame when folks throw in little comments on which version is better in a thread that isn't about that.
As I said-- every time the subject of the DEs coming to Blu-ray comes up, some folks just can't resist chiming in how the theatricals are better.
I am glad the folks who prefer the theatricals got that version on Blu-ray.
But when those of us who prefer the extended are talking about when it will come and others are trying to constantly point out that we are longing for something that is inferior, that is --- well, lame.
But if you weren't doing that--I'm glad.
I don't see greed, or incompetence for the theatrical cuts for the blus.
TWOK was put through a restoration process, rather that simply doing a transfer of a lousy print.
I suspect, and it would make sense, that the theatrical cuts are on the Blu-Rays simply for consistency of presentation.
Otherwise, they might as why we have X as the DE, while Y is the theatrical cut.