View Single Post
Old April 8 2013, 06:31 PM   #151
Location: Maryland
Re: Do You Believe the Official Chronology?

Jeez. When I wrote above that Star Trek should have stuck to star dates and never alluded to the conventionally numbered year back on Earth, it didn't occur to me that this would be the result: a whole stack of posts giving proof that it makes no difference. Fans (many of them, perhaps) evidently like to think about sequence of events, whether they're given Earth years or star dates to chew on. You could all be Talmudic scholars (and surely a few of us would have been if we still lived in pre-industrial times).
gottacook is offline   Reply With Quote