Thread: Why Khan?
View Single Post
Old February 27 2013, 11:27 PM   #63
CorporalClegg
Vice Admiral
 
Re: Why Khan?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
If indeed Cumberbatch is playing Khan, which is still just a popular theory at this point. We shouldn't treat it as an article of faith.
Yes. And I still don't think he is Khan. From a story escalation stand point, it makes the most sense to wait for film three.

It just annoys me to no end that people have to get all nuts over a few cosmetic changes that are ultimately meaningless. But as I've pointed out before, you're one of a handful of people who are actually creatively (and financially!) invested in Khan, and you don't care what Paramount does. Others should take that to heart.
__________________
I haven't much to say.
CorporalClegg is offline   Reply With Quote